Automatic, regular, unattended alkalinity monitoring

MaddyP

'Til Reefdom Come...
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
4,530
Location
Vancouver, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Interesting concept! It appears to be an adaptation of the flow injection method, but the selection valve is replaced by solenoid pinch valves? If so, I can imagine programming complexity. Why not utilize the sequential injection method and move from using mL of reagent to microliters per test? Method is the same, programming would be slightly more complicated. Either way, I'm looking forward to seeing this on the market!
 

K100286

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
134
Reaction score
58
Location
Oakland, ca.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very interesting. Since I am using the Trition method I need to measure the alk every day, and this would be a big help. Since I don't use any controllers, would your device give me the alk reading on the box with a probe in the water? Like the pinpoint ph monitors?
Dick Flanagan
 

melev

Avid Hobbyist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
2,141
Reaction score
1,623
Location
Ft Worth, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very interesting. Since I am using the Trition method I need to measure the alk every day, and this would be a big help. Since I don't use any controllers, would your device give me the alk reading on the box with a probe in the water? Like the pinpoint ph monitors?
Dick Flanagan

The reading would be on the front of the device. It doesn't have a probe in the water, it has tubing that draws water from the system into the device for testing. The latest result is on the screen.
 

JonasRoman

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Messages
899
Reaction score
1,269
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am not calculating dKH from other parameters.
Thanks for answer, i realize you are busy at the moment;-). Well, then I understand, you have made a "salifertrobot", aka, automatic titration device. Do you have a photosensor which tell colourshift and then count the amount acid to that point? and then convert this amount of acid to a voltage in the BNC?. That is very cool, and a smart way, excluding the need of infrared sensors measuring CO2. I still wonder why the measurement fluctuates during photoperiod? After realizing the main mechanism of you excellent invention, i guess this is due to KH and Ca consumption(and not CO2-consumption) by calcification that is more rapid during light period. If you can confirm this i am satisfied with my very first question and again: impressed work, and wish you all luck to getting this device on the market:) I am impressed:)

Regards
Jonas Roman
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
10,883
Reaction score
29,882
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Congratulations


This equipment will have a wider use than only monitoring and regulating a saltwater aquarium. There is probably a demand of such an equipment to monitoring and regulate the nitrification process in fish farms and wastewater plants. Today – pH is used as a monitoring and regulation tool but it’s an indirect function of alkalinity. If you could measure the alkalinity directly is would be more cost effective than today.

It’s a smart use of the pH measurement tool in order to be able to connect to an aquarium computer without waiting for the aquarium computer industry coming out with special expansion cards. However - I can see one limit – at least according to GHL profilux. Their pH controller does not measure higher pH than 10.5 and lower than 3.5. It means that you are only able to use the computer for regulation in the range of 3.5 – 10.5 in KH if I have understand the things right. I do not know with APEX – if it has this limitation also but I was looking for a controller that need to manage both reading and regulate pH up to 14 and one of the few was a Hanna controller.

This maybe has a minor impact for us because we normally runs around 7-9 as KH

The most exciting thing is this that you write in post 213.

Yes, you can treat waste and rinse lines as you suggest. I've dabbled with doing a similar Ca monitor, but put that idea on the "back burner" so that I could just focus on getting the Alkalinity prototype as ready as possible for MACNA in the short time I had.

Then I saw your video from MACNA – the first things coming up in my mind was just the possibility to use the equipment as a titration tool for both alk, Ca and Mg

Once again – congratulations and I think that the equipment will have a bright future



Sincerely Lasse
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
JimWelsh

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for answer, i realize you are busy at the moment;-). Well, then I understand, you have made a "salifertrobot", aka, automatic titration device. Do you have a photosensor which tell colourshift and then count the amount acid to that point? and then convert this amount of acid to a voltage in the BNC?. That is very cool, and a smart way, excluding the need of infrared sensors measuring CO2. I still wonder why the measurement fluctuates during photoperiod? After realizing the main mechanism of you excellent invention, i guess this is due to KH and Ca consumption(and not CO2-consumption) by calcification that is more rapid during light period. If you can confirm this i am satisfied with my very first question and again: impressed work, and wish you all luck to getting this device on the market:) I am impressed:)

Regards
Jonas Roman
Yes, Jonas, the diurnal swing I observe and describe is due to two factors: (1) I dose Randy's Recipe #1 in small increments evenly throughout the day, so alkalinity supplementation is constant, and (2) Alkalinity demand increases during the day when corals are actively calcifying, and is substantially reduced at night when this process slows significantly.
 
OP
OP
JimWelsh

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
However - I can see one limit – at least according to GHL profilux. Their pH controller does not measure higher pH than 10.5 and lower than 3.5. It means that you are only able to use the computer for regulation in the range of 3.5 – 10.5 in KH if I have understand the things right.
I was not aware of this limitation of the GHL Profilux controller. It could be addressed, however, by providing an option to report the units in meq/L instead of dKH. The lower limit of 3.5, when expressed as meq/L, translates to a value of 9.8 dKH, so there is an "overlap" between 9.8 dKH and 10.5 dKH where the user has the option to change units, so the entire range at which people tend to keep tanks could still be covered. The current device has the ability to output a pH probe voltage within a "pH" range of 0.0 - 14.0.
 

bif24701

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2016
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,207
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Holy crap, it took about 12 minutes to register a change from 7 to 11 dkh?!

Hmmm.... Perhaps it's not applicable to emergencies..

12 min is plenty of time. Unless you literally dumped an entire gallon of Kalk with out looking..........
 

melev

Avid Hobbyist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
2,141
Reaction score
1,623
Location
Ft Worth, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Holy crap, it took about 12 minutes to register a change from 7 to 11 dkh?!

Hmmm.... Perhaps it's not applicable to emergencies..

Most people that have a disaster like that happen while they are out to dinner for a couple of hours. For example you do a water change, clean your skimmer, and grab a meal. Your ATO full of kalkwasser dumps in a week's worth and you come home to a milky tank (true story that happened to a local club member). To have the Alkalinity Monitor measure THAT often to avoid any type of risk would be costly in reagent. If you had it set to run twice a day, odds are it wouldn't be testing while you're having dinner. Of course you could program it to run continuously and then set it back to normal when you get home. But how paranoid are you? hehehe I sleep every day and wake up to see how my reef is doing, and yes Murphy may strike at any time. Gotta find that happy medium, or go full on OCD and pay to have someone stand next to your tank ready to act.
 

bif24701

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2016
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,207
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Most people that have a disaster like that happen while they are out to dinner for a couple of hours. For example you do a water change, clean your skimmer, and grab a meal. Your ATO full of kalkwasser dumps in a week's worth and you come home to a milky tank (true story that happened to a local club member). To have the Alkalinity Monitor measure THAT often to avoid any type of risk would be costly in reagent. If you had it set to run twice a day, odds are it wouldn't be testing while you're having dinner. Of course you could program it to run continuously and then set it back to normal when you get home. But how paranoid are you? hehehe I sleep every day and wake up to see how my reef is doing, and yes Murphy may strike at any time. Gotta find that happy medium, or go full on OCD and pay to have someone stand next to your tank ready to act.

Wouldn't the PH probe catch that?
 

bif24701

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2016
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,207
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Either way, this has real usefulness in our hobby and many will chose to buy it dang the cost. However I suspect it will not be completely out of reach of the average to more advanced reefer.
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
10,883
Reaction score
29,882
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was not aware of this limitation of the GHL Profilux controller. It could be addressed, however, by providing an option to report the units in meq/L instead of dKH. The lower limit of 3.5, when expressed as meq/L, translates to a value of 9.8 dKH, so there is an "overlap" between 9.8 dKH and 10.5 dKH where the user has the option to change units, so the entire range at which people tend to keep tanks could still be covered. The current device has the ability to output a pH probe voltage within a "pH" range of 0.0 - 14.0.

I´m not sure that I understand all of this but there is one more problem. If the value will be below 3.5 or higher than 10.5 - there will be an alarm. The ProfiLux will see this values as a defect probe! Theoretical - if we use the ideal slope of 56 mV/pH unit - the ProfiLux will se every measurement outside the range of 196 mV (pH 3.5) and below - 196 mV (pH 10.5) as defect probes

Sincerely Lasse
 

Thales

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
4,725
Location
SF BA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I love Jim's device
i-sSj53d7-X2.png
 

Alfrareef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
823
Reaction score
664
Location
Portugal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also!!!
And for intelligent reefers that are discussing how could be done in a more better or simpler way i'm sorry but i must remember that Jim has build it and already with good looking. Posts and talk don't measure KH.
 

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,763
Reaction score
87,181
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I love Jim's device
i-sSj53d7-X2.png

Richard I have been waiting to hear about your experience! Looks like it's running well for you!
 

deaclauderdale

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
351
Reaction score
184
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks Dave. I will likely cover this in a publication hosted somewhere else. Please let me know if you change your policy about that kind of sharing of information. :D
If you wouldn't mind PM'ing the link to said review I'd be eternally grateful.
 

Algae invading algae: Have you had unwanted algae in your good macroalgae?

  • I regularly have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 37 34.9%
  • I occasionally have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 22 20.8%
  • I rarely have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 9 8.5%
  • I never have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 6 5.7%
  • I don’t have macroalgae.

    Votes: 29 27.4%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 2.8%
Back
Top