Giesemann/ATI T5 lamp comparison - pics, PAR, and a whole mess of data

OP
OP
jedimasterben

jedimasterben

Bubble coral sting good
View Badges
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
432
Location
Okeechobee, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So in laymans terms this means....?
The ballast should run the lamps at exactly 1.00 ballast factor, which means they are at their nominal power and nominal output. If the number is higher than 1.00, then the ballast is overdriving the lamps, changing their spectral output and increasing output wattage (and therefore PAR). If the number is lower than 1.00, then the ballast is underdriving the lamps, also changing their spectral output and decreasing output wattage (and PAR). :)


Just looked up the data for 54w lamps and 80w lamps to round everything out.
Dimming
2x 54w - 1.00
1x 80w - 1.00

Non-dimming
2x 54w - 1.00
1x 80w - 1.00

So those will run the lamps exactly at spec. For the 24w non-dimming ballast above, it will overdrive the lamps by 12%, whereas the dimming 39w ballast will underdrive the lamps by 16%.
 

Spschief85

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
159
Reaction score
37
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So it turns the dimmable versions running at 100% are 16% under driven and the non dimmable let are over driven by 12% thus putting out 28% more par than the dimmable?
 
OP
OP
jedimasterben

jedimasterben

Bubble coral sting good
View Badges
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
432
Location
Okeechobee, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So it turns the dimmable versions running at 100% are 16% under driven and the non dimmable let are over driven by 12% thus putting out 28% more par than the dimmable?
The link from efficiency to PAR isn't quite so linear, but I would imagine that 20% is more realistic.
 

Spschief85

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
159
Reaction score
37
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would like to get a par meter and see the actual numbers my 8 bulb dimmable are putting out, in the end I want the most par I can get as um stick crazy, I know I have plenty of light with the 8 bulb and 2 xho actinic reefbrites, but it would be nice to see how moving up or down in various par zones color acros diffeeently.
 

PaulG

New Member
View Badges
Joined
May 16, 2017
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
WOW nice work Ben! I am actually running some of the 65k Tropics. Pretty unflattering but one in an 8 bulb fixture works for propagation purposes quite well. Personally not a fan of the coral+ or any of that pinkish spectrum bulb aesthetically.
Hi Adam - I am installing an Auroa fixture and CoralVue guys recommended to use Tropic (2x) and Super Actinic(2x). You have been running Tropics - what are your thoughts? I have not seen many people running this combo. BTW - I have mixed reef with medium to easy SPS. Thank you so much for your advice!
 

videosilva

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
70
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So glad to have seen this post. I will now copy and past from another forum and REAL WORLD observation of the KING OF LIGHT ATI.
 

videosilva

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
70
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been reading for a few years now about ATI lights. I keep reading that these lights are the BEST and the best thing since sliced bread. I keep reading about ATI lights, like they are the KING of all lights.

Give it a rest. Like Donald Trump would say " FAKE NEWS"!

I finally bought one of the GOD of all lights and was expecting it to pop, moonwalk in the tank. IT LOOKS LIKE ANY OTHER BULB. Nothing special to hype about. I have an aqua. something Blue Actinic bulb and now an ATI Blue Plus bulb. Both bulbs are new.

When looking at the lights straight on and blinding your eyes there is NO noticeable difference.

When looking at the lights in the tank there is NO noticeable difference.

So whats with all the ATI hype ? People getting PAID to publicize the KING of ALL light ?

BOGUS waste of time and money !!!! It seems like people are seeing lights for the FIRST time in their life. Must be 12 years olds wasting time.
 

rockskimmerflow

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
620
Reaction score
632
Location
Socal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been reading for a few years now about ATI lights. I keep reading that these lights are the BEST and the best thing since sliced bread. I keep reading about ATI lights, like they are the KING of all lights.

Give it a rest. Like Donald Trump would say " FAKE NEWS"!

I finally bought one of the GOD of all lights and was expecting it to pop, moonwalk in the tank. IT LOOKS LIKE ANY OTHER BULB. Nothing special to hype about. I have an aqua. something Blue Actinic bulb and now an ATI Blue Plus bulb. Both bulbs are new.

When looking at the lights straight on and blinding your eyes there is NO noticeable difference.

When looking at the lights in the tank there is NO noticeable difference.

So whats with all the ATI hype ? People getting PAID to publicize the KING of ALL light ?

BOGUS waste of time and money !!!! It seems like people are seeing lights for the FIRST time in their life. Must be 12 years olds wasting time.
Are you trolling, or just painfully obtuse? Genuinely curious to know. Best regards
 

actik

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Messages
401
Reaction score
638
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And now for something a little different. Coralvue had some of the Giesemann lamps sent to a third party lamp manufacturer and asked for them to do things like spectral output graphs, lumen data, electrical data, etc. Data was also collected for some ATI and D-D Powerchrome lamps, as well, but I’ve removed the D-D lamps as they are no longer in production. The third party did not wish to be identified (I think they were worried if Giesemann or ATI didn't like the results that they might sue, etc), so take these for what you will, but keep in mind that each lamp had over 600 data points that were measured, across 20 tests (each lamp tested twice, and some duplicate lamps were sent), for a total of 12,000 data points. It would be rather… tedious to change juuuust the right ones.


Spectral measurements were taken using a Gooch & Housego OL 756 Spectroradiometer (double monochromator).


Radiometric and luminous output data was collected using a Labsphere LMS-3M integrating sphere, measurements at 10†distance, no reflectors.


I have uploaded each spreadsheet containing the raw data (which includes functions to produce a spectral graph based on each reading of each individual wavelength from 200-800nm) to Google Sheets for easy viewing. The caveat to that is that, unlike Excel, it does not connect each point using a line, so the graphs on the linked spreadsheets are just points on the plot. I have pulled the graphs out of Excel and have uploaded them separately and will post each with the appropriate data.


First up, let’s take a look at the electrical, luminous, and PAR characteristics for each of the tested lamps. The lamps were tested twice each - once brand new out of the box, the other with 100 hours of burn time. (sorry for the screenshot here, there is no easy way to put a spreadsheet onto the forum, so if you want a better view, you can find the full data set here: )
ati%20giesemann%20data.png




ATI Aquablue Special
0 hours

ati%20aquablue%20special%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20aquablue%20special%20100h.png



ATI Blue Plus
0 hours

ati%20blue%20plus%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20blue%20plus%20100h.png



ATI Coral Plus
0 hours

ati%20coral%20plus%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20coral%20plus%20100h.png





ATI True Actinic
0 hours

ati%20true%20actinic%200h.png




100 hours

ati%20true%20actinic%20100h.png




Giesemann Actinic Blue
0 hours

giesemann%20actinic%20blue%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20actinic%20blue%20100h.png




Giesemann Aquablue Coral
0 hours

giesemann%20aquablue%20coral%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20aquablue%20coral%20100h.png




Giesemann Lagoon Blue
0 hours

giesemann%20lagoon%20blue%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20lagoon%20blue%20100h.png




Hopefully that gives a little bit of data on these new lamps to show that Giesemann’s new line is better than what they could do previously.


Now, which combo would I recommend? Well, that’s 100% personal preference. I really am not tied to using any of the four T5 in my Sunpower because I have the tank pretty sufficiently covered with two rows of LED arrays.
IMG_1251.jpg



However, I’ve been playing with using a pair of the lamps for a couple of hours per day. When no LEDs are on, using one white (Aquablue Coral or Coral Plus) and one blue (Actinic Blue or Blue Plus), IMHO it doesn’t look all that great. I know most people use and adore that 1:1 lamp combo, but to me, it is bland. I am not a fan of overly blue tanks, and a 1:1 ratio is overly blue. Adding a purple lamp (Purple Plus, Super Purple) helps a little, but still not ‘white’ enough IMHO.


None of these combinations would be inherently better as far as growth is concerned, as their PAR is pretty similar, so using all blue lamps or all white lamps will grow corals as well as a mixture of the two. Lots of people will still tell you ‘10K for growth, 20K for color’ but IMHO it has more to do with the extra intensity from ‘10K’ bulbs than in the spectral change (it takes more energy to make blue photons than it does green or red, so you can make more photons [meaning more PAR] with green and red). The only exception is for violet bulbs (Super Actinic, True Actinic), as violet have far lower total photons emitted, so much less PAR. These should only be used in 6-8 bulb combinations if you need to lower intensity but still want to use all the bulbs.


So pick whichever combo you think looks best over your tank and let your corals grow!

Wow..thank you so much I've been trying to decide on what combination for the longest time, and the pictures help alot, I like your proffered Choi e also well balanced I'm not a fan of all blue :)
 

Bpb

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
4,516
Reaction score
6,348
Location
College Station
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been reading for a few years now about ATI lights. I keep reading that these lights are the BEST and the best thing since sliced bread. I keep reading about ATI lights, like they are the KING of all lights.

Give it a rest. Like Donald Trump would say " FAKE NEWS"!

I finally bought one of the GOD of all lights and was expecting it to pop, moonwalk in the tank. IT LOOKS LIKE ANY OTHER BULB. Nothing special to hype about. I have an aqua. something Blue Actinic bulb and now an ATI Blue Plus bulb. Both bulbs are new.

When looking at the lights straight on and blinding your eyes there is NO noticeable difference.

When looking at the lights in the tank there is NO noticeable difference.

So whats with all the ATI hype ? People getting PAID to publicize the KING of ALL light ?

BOGUS waste of time and money !!!! It seems like people are seeing lights for the FIRST time in their life. Must be 12 years olds wasting time.

never saw this. Sorry to resurrect but wow. Is that real life?
 

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Excellent work man! Appreciate it.

And now for something a little different. Coralvue had some of the Giesemann lamps sent to a third party lamp manufacturer and asked for them to do things like spectral output graphs, lumen data, electrical data, etc. Data was also collected for some ATI and D-D Powerchrome lamps, as well, but I’ve removed the D-D lamps as they are no longer in production. The third party did not wish to be identified (I think they were worried if Giesemann or ATI didn't like the results that they might sue, etc), so take these for what you will, but keep in mind that each lamp had over 600 data points that were measured, across 20 tests (each lamp tested twice, and some duplicate lamps were sent), for a total of 12,000 data points. It would be rather… tedious to change juuuust the right ones.


Spectral measurements were taken using a Gooch & Housego OL 756 Spectroradiometer (double monochromator).


Radiometric and luminous output data was collected using a Labsphere LMS-3M integrating sphere, measurements at 10†distance, no reflectors.


I have uploaded each spreadsheet containing the raw data (which includes functions to produce a spectral graph based on each reading of each individual wavelength from 200-800nm) to Google Sheets for easy viewing. The caveat to that is that, unlike Excel, it does not connect each point using a line, so the graphs on the linked spreadsheets are just points on the plot. I have pulled the graphs out of Excel and have uploaded them separately and will post each with the appropriate data.


First up, let’s take a look at the electrical, luminous, and PAR characteristics for each of the tested lamps. The lamps were tested twice each - once brand new out of the box, the other with 100 hours of burn time. (sorry for the screenshot here, there is no easy way to put a spreadsheet onto the forum, so if you want a better view, you can find the full data set here: )
ati%20giesemann%20data.png




ATI Aquablue Special
0 hours

ati%20aquablue%20special%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20aquablue%20special%20100h.png



ATI Blue Plus
0 hours

ati%20blue%20plus%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20blue%20plus%20100h.png



ATI Coral Plus
0 hours

ati%20coral%20plus%200h.png



100 hours

ati%20coral%20plus%20100h.png





ATI True Actinic
0 hours

ati%20true%20actinic%200h.png




100 hours

ati%20true%20actinic%20100h.png




Giesemann Actinic Blue
0 hours

giesemann%20actinic%20blue%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20actinic%20blue%20100h.png




Giesemann Aquablue Coral
0 hours

giesemann%20aquablue%20coral%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20aquablue%20coral%20100h.png




Giesemann Lagoon Blue
0 hours

giesemann%20lagoon%20blue%200h.png




100 hours

giesemann%20lagoon%20blue%20100h.png




Hopefully that gives a little bit of data on these new lamps to show that Giesemann’s new line is better than what they could do previously.


Now, which combo would I recommend? Well, that’s 100% personal preference. I really am not tied to using any of the four T5 in my Sunpower because I have the tank pretty sufficiently covered with two rows of LED arrays.
IMG_1251.jpg



However, I’ve been playing with using a pair of the lamps for a couple of hours per day. When no LEDs are on, using one white (Aquablue Coral or Coral Plus) and one blue (Actinic Blue or Blue Plus), IMHO it doesn’t look all that great. I know most people use and adore that 1:1 lamp combo, but to me, it is bland. I am not a fan of overly blue tanks, and a 1:1 ratio is overly blue. Adding a purple lamp (Purple Plus, Super Purple) helps a little, but still not ‘white’ enough IMHO.


None of these combinations would be inherently better as far as growth is concerned, as their PAR is pretty similar, so using all blue lamps or all white lamps will grow corals as well as a mixture of the two. Lots of people will still tell you ‘10K for growth, 20K for color’ but IMHO it has more to do with the extra intensity from ‘10K’ bulbs than in the spectral change (it takes more energy to make blue photons than it does green or red, so you can make more photons [meaning more PAR] with green and red). The only exception is for violet bulbs (Super Actinic, True Actinic), as violet have far lower total photons emitted, so much less PAR. These should only be used in 6-8 bulb combinations if you need to lower intensity but still want to use all the bulbs.


So pick whichever combo you think looks best over your tank and let your corals grow!
 

Huynhter_Soldier

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
244
Reaction score
86
Location
Clarksville
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Could anyone give me a good option for an 8 bulb 80w Giesemann Matrix. Planning on adding 2 quanta pro OG pop led bars to supplement this fixture as well. Needing to get new bulbs soon and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on what combo to get?
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 24 35.3%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 17 25.0%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 12 17.6%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 15 22.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top