From ATI ESSENTIAL PLUS to BALLING TM (the original)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

bandando

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2022
Messages
148
Reaction score
45
Location
Italy
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Currently I am dosing 60 ml of ATI ESSENTIAL PLUS 1 and 60 ml of ATI ESSENTIAL PLUS 2 daily, and to maintain stable salinity, I have to remove 480 ml of saltwater daily by dosing pump.
I have some doubts about long-term ion balance despite regular water changes.

I have decided to switch to the original Tropic Marin Balling.

Two questions:
1. Based on the experience of others, what could be the equivalent dosage with Tropic Marin products (A-B-C)?
2. Will I still need to remove saltwater to keep the salinity stable?
 

Pod_01

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Messages
1,395
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Waterloo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Currently I am dosing 60 ml of ATI ESSENTIAL PLUS 1 and 60 ml of ATI ESSENTIAL PLUS 2 daily, and to maintain stable salinity, I have to remove 480 ml of saltwater daily by dosing pump.
I have some doubts about long-term ion balance despite regular water changes.

I have decided to switch to the original Tropic Marin Balling.

Two questions:
1. Based on the experience of others, what could be the equivalent dosage with Tropic Marin products (A-B-C)?
2. Will I still need to remove saltwater to keep the salinity stable?
Not sure about item 1. But if you know your daily Alk consumption the dose can be estimated.

Yes for item 2, you will need to remove saltwater to deal with salinity creep. All 2 and 3 part systems have salinity creep.

If you do not want salinity creep you can try TM AFR. With this product there is calcium creep but if you do water changes you will likely not notice the creep.

Good luck,
 

Koty

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
913
Reaction score
763
Location
Rehovot Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IME there is also calcium creep in TM Balling ABC. Maybe the solution is to make the A 94-97% of the recommended concentration.
 

Pod_01

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Messages
1,395
Reaction score
1,309
Location
Waterloo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IME there is also calcium creep in TM Balling ABC. Maybe the solution is to make the A 94-97% of the recommended concentration.
Yes there can be calcium creep, the consumption in general follows:

Alk 2.8 dKH
Calcium 18-20 ppm
Magnesium 0-2 ppm

I am not sure what the theoretical addition of part A of TM Original Balling is vs. Part B.

Maybe @Hans-Werner can let us know. Inquiring minds want to know…
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,737
Reaction score
2,677
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes there can be calcium creep, the consumption in general follows:

Alk 2.8 dKH
Calcium 18-20 ppm
Magnesium 0-2 ppm

I am not sure what the theoretical addition of part A of TM Original Balling is vs. Part B.

Maybe @Hans-Werner can let us know. Inquiring minds want to know…
Tropic Marin Original Balling, when equal volumes are dosed, doses calcium and alkalinity in stoichiometric ratios which means the ratio to form calcium carbonate.

Many tanks consume more alkalinity than calicum compared to this stoichiometric ratio which causes the calcium creep.

Alk 2.8 dKH
Ca 20 ppm (19.97 ppm)

is the stoichiometric consumption for formation of pure calcium carbonate without calcium being replaced by magnesium in magnesium calcite. With some magnesium consumption it meets the numbers you are giving.
 

DO YOU HAVE ANY UNUSUAL, UNCOMMON, OR UNPOPULAR INVERTS IN YOUR REEF? SHOW THEM OFF!

  • Yep, and I'm glad I do!

    Votes: 22 25.0%
  • Yep, but I wish I didn't...

    Votes: 4 4.5%
  • Nope, but I'm not opposed to them!

    Votes: 45 51.1%
  • Nope, and I'm glad I don't.

    Votes: 16 18.2%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 1 1.1%
Back
Top