I've been using the TM/FM Marine test (not Comp) through the Mastertronic for around a year. It's always given me ranges from 5-8 ppm. I wrote Red Sea in the title and can't edit it.
Today I ran a check with the Hanna HR checker. It gave me a reading of 55 ppm.
I brought out my old, trusty API tester with unexpired reagents and it's giving me something in the high 10s.
It seems as though the TM/FM test is about in line with the API test, but I've always been under the impression that Hanna checkers are the most accurate. This is worrisome.
I'm running the TM/FM Marine Comp test now and will post that when complete. I don't have the materials to run the test manually.
In people's experience, should I trust the Hanna checker more?
One additional tid-bit of information is that I have to load the C1 on the Hanna checker about six times before it finally jumps to C2. It is supposed to go to C2 in just a few seconds, and if I wait it will eventually get there in about 20 seconds. Yet someone told me that if it doesn't go there right away I should re-do it.
Today I ran a check with the Hanna HR checker. It gave me a reading of 55 ppm.
I brought out my old, trusty API tester with unexpired reagents and it's giving me something in the high 10s.
It seems as though the TM/FM test is about in line with the API test, but I've always been under the impression that Hanna checkers are the most accurate. This is worrisome.
I'm running the TM/FM Marine Comp test now and will post that when complete. I don't have the materials to run the test manually.
In people's experience, should I trust the Hanna checker more?
One additional tid-bit of information is that I have to load the C1 on the Hanna checker about six times before it finally jumps to C2. It is supposed to go to C2 in just a few seconds, and if I wait it will eventually get there in about 20 seconds. Yet someone told me that if it doesn't go there right away I should re-do it.