are hanna checkers worth it

William Chiavetta

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
436
Reaction score
478
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was thinking about getting hanna checkers but I'd need 7 different ones and I dont really have $500 I guess I could buy them used but it would still be expensive and I'm not sure it would be 100% working.
 
Last edited:

xmjxflipx

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
44
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
For me i prefer hanna for phosphate and nitrate since the general kits vary in range and hanna is more. Accurate for those. Cal, mag and alk i use salifert qs my backup test kits and i get 100 uses compared to 25 per reagant for hanna.
 
OP
OP
William Chiavetta

William Chiavetta

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
436
Reaction score
478
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would not think you need 8 of them.

I like the ones I have except Magnesium

Alk, High Range Nitrate, ULR Phosphate, Phosphorous .
what about ones to measure the nitrogen cycle, calcium, and ph
 
OP
OP
William Chiavetta

William Chiavetta

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
436
Reaction score
478
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Aside -- Hanna makes the Marine Master checker that does a bunch of parameters in one unit for <$500 so you could check that out.

I like the Hanna checkers that I own but I only have 3,,, and I'm color blind,,, so there's that.
hahaha
 

MarineandReef Jaron

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2022
Messages
554
Reaction score
515
Location
Tempe Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you ask me it is worth picking and choosing. My favorites are the Alk, Ultralow Range Phosphate, and High Range Nitrate. These all use 1 reagent and are some of the most accurate and easy to use.

Some of the other checkers use 2 or even 3 reagents and are not the most accurate. The checkers are not the best for measuring everything.
 
OP
OP
William Chiavetta

William Chiavetta

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
436
Reaction score
478
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have the Hanna alk, phosphate and high range nitrate. I use a Red Sea pro kit for calcium. I haven’t seen a need for anything else. Magnesium is rarely checked.
what about the nitrogen cycle, ph, and why not hanna calcium
 
OP
OP
William Chiavetta

William Chiavetta

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
436
Reaction score
478
Location
Raleigh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Because I jacked up one of mine while testing one night. Put reagent directly into the checker with no cuvette. You could also be getting scratched glass. Glass could also be stained. If parameters are your goal, don’t you want to have trust in the process ?
true
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
68,301
Reaction score
64,793
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was thinking about getting hanna checkers but I'd need 7 different ones and I dont really have $500 I guess I could buy them used but it would still be expensive and I'm not sure it would be 100% working.

Which 7 parameters do you want to test?
 

Tavero

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 5, 2022
Messages
639
Reaction score
620
Location
Somewhere
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was thinking about getting hanna checkers but I'd need 7 different ones and I dont really have $500 I guess I could buy them used but it would still be expensive and I'm not sure it would be 100% working.
Are they worth it?

For phosphate: yes.
For the rest of the parameters? NOOOOOOO.

Salifert is more accurate when it comes to alkalinity, calcium and magnesium than Hanna will ever be. Titration is simply more accurate than extinction photometry. That's a physical limitation.
And when it comes to nitrate a result like: between 20mg/l and 10mg/l is usually close enough.
 
Back
Top