No, not maybe. That's why I said, "If you have a known solution of 35ppt"
Enjoy the rabbit hole of questioning calibration fluid.
Not sure why people want to make this more complicated than it needs to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you have a known solution of 35ppt, and your refractometer reads 35ppt for that solution, and your tank water doesn't, you can be confident your tank is not at 35ppt.
It doesn't have to be more complicated than that unless you want it to be. $13 for calibration fluid. Why not just buy a bottle and be done with it?
And how do you assure your "known" calibration fluid for $13 is really known? So, maybe.No, not maybe. That's why I said, "If you have a known solution of 35ppt"
Enjoy the rabbit hole of questioning calibration fluid.
Not sure why people want to make this more complicated than it needs to be.
Right, so make your own. Then you will have a known solution of 35ppt - and my conditional statement will be true.
$13 for calibration fluid. Why not just buy a bottle and be done with it?
EXCUSE THIS OL MAN, DID NOT THINK MY TYPING IN CAPS WOULD BE CONSTRUED AS E-YELLING....JUST A HABIT...I HOPE THE SPINNING HAS CEASED...UNLESS READING THIS CAUSES A RELAPSE...LOL...Don't worry your e-yelling had my head spinning.
But for how accurate one has to be I don't believe one has to be precisely at 35ppt. It's a good target.
FYI, online it is considered yelling and does make it harder to read for some.EXCUSE THIS OL MAN, DID NOT THINK MY TYPING IN CAPS WOULD BE CONSTRUED AS E-YELLING....JUST A HABIT...I HOPE THE SPINNING HAS CEASED...UNLESS READING THIS CAUSES A RELAPSE...LOL...
Assuming the calibration solution you bought is correct.So because of this thread I bought the calibration solution. Then I put it in. Read the number and it was spot on. Last time it was calibrated was with RODI but now I have a reference.
Assuming the calibration solution you bought is correct.
I did link to this thread above. [emoji4]The plot thickens