That’s good to know as I can save money. I was weighing my opinion based to BRS website that stated the heavy bio load was around 250g aquarium and these were the 2 that carried that load. Am I missing something?
www.bulkreefsupply.com
That’s great thanks for the link. What about this one.Unless space in the sump is an issue you could get this one and save more.
Regal 250INT 10" Internal Protein Skimmer (VarioS)
BRS Recommended for tanks up to: Heavy Bioload (Most Common) - 250 Gallons Medium Bioload - 475 Gallons Light Bioload - 600 gallons Reef Octopus In Sump 10" Protein Skimmer from Reef Octopus - with a controllable VarioS DC pumps to process more or less water, depending on your setup...
www.bulkreefsupply.com
These skimmers are both really good so id say they are closer to max gallons then some. Heavy stock is serious though I doubt many are heavy stock on this forum. I typically base this type of decision on a medium stock density. Really how many fish are you planning on having. If it was fish only I may change my decision. I have talked with one of arguably the best skimmer manufactures in person and what he said and showed me really made a lot of sense. Most people buy these higher end skimmers are grossly over skimming and wasting money.
Thank you I appreciate the insight on this subject, I’m sure my view of over stock is probably light if gauges properly lol. So I would be good with the 200 or 250 then without the fears of over skimming?
I dont understand this. They do different things. Can you explain more?
Thanks for tossing that wrench into this. Lol.
They basically do the same thing they remove impurities from the water and the algae scrubber does a much better job and you never have to worry about getting any algae breakouts
I am not a hater of algae scrubbers, I have built a few in my time never bought one though. They do some similar jobs but a skimmer is going to remove more "impurities" than the scrubber. Used in concert they are a great duo just like a refugium (scrubber is actually better than a fuge) but a scrubber cannot replace a skimmer. The scrubber is better at controlling nitrate and phosphate. Something a scrubber cannot do is drive co2 from the water column like a skimmer. True the algae will remove co2 from the water but not at the same rate a skimmer can. Of course this is dependent on air quality around the tank. There is also stuff like phenols and tannins that a skimmer can remove and a scrubber can't. But you are correct in pure nitrate and phosphate removal the scrubber wins, if that is what you meant.
I say 200 @Jekyl says 250 either will work as will the 300. Im saying save the $ get the 200 it will be more than enough.
That’s what I was trying to decide between the 200sss annd 250SSS. I think the 300 although will work is not needed so wasted money, I’m leaning towards the 200. The difference in price is approximately 180 CAD and if not needed then I’d rather keep that and get the 200 if this skimmer is perfectly capable of doing the job without issue of underperforming.
