does pound of rock per gallon rule apply to large tanks?

Grimreefer89

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
170
Reaction score
119
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
title pretty much covers it but looking around people are saying it doesn't apply and a large tank is different? any advice before i purchase 210 lbs of dry rock.
 

this is me

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
744
Reaction score
2,550
Location
MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You want the rocks. Whether if you want them in the display tank, it’s up to you on how you aquascape. More rocks is better in general. Just not all in the display tank. Buy extra, stuff them in the sump.
 

fishguy242

Cronies..... INSERT BUILD THREAD BADGE HERE !!
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
43,485
Reaction score
251,218
Location
Illinois
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
HI ,old school here,yep,the more the better,the rock and skimmer are your life support system :)
 

kenchilada

Palytoxin Abuser
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
1,514
Reaction score
2,657
Location
Mandeville
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Depends how porous and mature the rock is. Good quality rock goes farther.

The 1lb per gallon "rule" is more of a guideline than a rule. You can supplement with bio-media like ceramic rings or blocks if needed.
 

Sisterlimonpot

Effortless Perfection
View Badges
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
3,885
Reaction score
7,928
Location
Litchfield Park
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Absolutely not. I have a 300 gallon and have less than 150 lbs. the premise behind 1 lb per gallon came from surface area for bacteria to perform the nitrogen cycle. There are many alternatives to that these days. I use cinctured glass like siporax in the sump to provide the necessary surface area.
 
OP
OP
Grimreefer89

Grimreefer89

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
170
Reaction score
119
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
ok i appreciate it i guess the siporax is a good solution then. i want islands not rock piles and its gonna be hard to accomplish this with 200 pds of rock lol.
 

92Miata

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2020
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
2,485
Location
Richmond, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Absolutely not. I have a 300 gallon and have less than 150 lbs. the premise behind 1 lb per gallon came from surface area for bacteria to perform the nitrogen cycle. There are many alternatives to that these days. I use cinctured glass like siporax in the sump to provide the necessary surface area.
It's not just that - tanks when this rule was invented were generally big piles of rock with poor flow. Much more processing capacity was needed because so much more food was rotting in the tank.


Nowadays, with much better flow and much better skimmers, tanks are very rarely limited by their ability to process nitrates (and biofiltration) in general)
 

WVNed

The fish are staring at me with hungry eyes.
View Badges
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
10,206
Reaction score
43,620
Location
Hurricane, WV
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Like many rules it can be broken but is a good enough rule to have value in the absence of other information. I have 400 pounds in my 400 gallon system spread among 3 tanks and the sump.
None of them are a wall of rock.
 
OP
OP
Grimreefer89

Grimreefer89

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
170
Reaction score
119
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i have large sump so i will definitely have some sort of something in it. my sump is designed for a fuge but i may just pile rocks and run the skimmer. still deciding, but rocks and substrate are next on my list to buy.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 42 31.1%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 5 3.7%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 34 25.2%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 48 35.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 6 4.4%
Back
Top