Electronic parameter testers

muggle0981

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
750
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are their any quality electronic water parameter testers or are the salifert/aquaforest/red sea testing kits the best to go with
 

ColoredRock

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Messages
854
Reaction score
1,027
Location
Murrieta, CA (North of San Diego)
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are their any quality electronic water parameter testers or are the salifert/aquaforest/red sea testing kits the best to go with
Kinda a loaded question...
Electronic as in a probe? (pH, ORP, Conductivity)
Electronic as in a color meter? (Hanna individually).. or APEX. GHL?..

There are some open source options out there @Borat

Or A DIY Alkalinity Test: By Randy Holmes-Farley
 

MaddyP

'Til Reefdom Come...
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
4,530
Location
Vancouver, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've had my eye on the Hach SL1000 though I don't think I could ever justify the cost...

 

Gtinnel

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
21,407
Reaction score
29,942
Location
Charleston, WV
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I agree with others that the question is pretty vague, but I use and love the Hanna checkers. I use them for ULR Phosphate, HR Nitrate, Alkalinity, and the copper checker is great if you qt and treat fish with copper. I've read mostly bad things about the calcium one because it is too complicated, and never waste your money on the LR Nitrate.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,509
Reaction score
63,933
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
???? Whats wrong w em

IMO, it's a poor design that is freakishly sensitive to tiny traces of calcium in the blank. I'm not sure if that's the primary problem or not, but it gives users far more headaches than other Hanna checkers.
 

305

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
108
Reaction score
64
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMO, it's a poor design that is freakishly sensitive to tiny traces of calcium in the blank. I'm not sure if that's the primary problem or not, but it gives users far more headaches than other Hanna checkers.
Ahhh so i take it itll always read a lil high?
Thanks
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,509
Reaction score
63,933
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ahhh so i take it itll always read a lil high?
Thanks

No, it read low from that issue. Little traces of calcium in the blank make the kit think there is a higher absorbance in the blank that needs to be subtracted out from the tank water reading..
 

Just grow it: Have you ever added CO2 to your reef tank?

  • I currently use a CO2 with my reef tank.

    Votes: 8 5.4%
  • I don’t currently use CO2 with my reef tank, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 5 3.4%
  • I have never used CO2 with my reef tank, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 8 5.4%
  • I have never used CO2 with my reef tank and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 120 81.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 6 4.1%
Back
Top