Hi all,
So despite my best intentions I now have a 300g ich management reef tank. I must have messed up my QT and fallow period as some fish are now showing spots again.
I see UV mentioned as an aid in reducing theront numbers and was ready to go out and buy an 80w unit from D-D. The slowest flow this unit can take without overheating is apparently around 2600lph which equates to just over 72uw/sec/cm2 which the manufacturer claim is adequate to kill MI. Reading further into UV though it seems that all evidence points to a minimum of 280uw/s/cm2 (and anywhere up to 800!) being required in order to kill MI.
So my question is, is this model, which is one of the strongest commonly available, and are all hobbyist grade UV's completely useless for aiding control of MI? It would certainly seem that way but so many people seem to swear by them and I would imagine the main reason many people purchase one is with MI in mind, is this just an incredibly clever marketing trick by the manufacturers or do they actually have some benefit in reducing theronts?
I know expensive commercial UV's would work but I have neither the space or the budget for these.
I'd be interested to hear everyone experiences.
Thanks
Nick
So despite my best intentions I now have a 300g ich management reef tank. I must have messed up my QT and fallow period as some fish are now showing spots again.
I see UV mentioned as an aid in reducing theront numbers and was ready to go out and buy an 80w unit from D-D. The slowest flow this unit can take without overheating is apparently around 2600lph which equates to just over 72uw/sec/cm2 which the manufacturer claim is adequate to kill MI. Reading further into UV though it seems that all evidence points to a minimum of 280uw/s/cm2 (and anywhere up to 800!) being required in order to kill MI.
So my question is, is this model, which is one of the strongest commonly available, and are all hobbyist grade UV's completely useless for aiding control of MI? It would certainly seem that way but so many people seem to swear by them and I would imagine the main reason many people purchase one is with MI in mind, is this just an incredibly clever marketing trick by the manufacturers or do they actually have some benefit in reducing theronts?
I know expensive commercial UV's would work but I have neither the space or the budget for these.
I'd be interested to hear everyone experiences.
Thanks
Nick