I am told they are doing some fairly massive back end modifications to the site.
Ah, that explains it. Thanks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am told they are doing some fairly massive back end modifications to the site.
Did i blink and miss the answers?
I believe that's the sentiment of most people...
I can filter following questions out of all that have been said in the article and here :
1. Is TRITON ICP-OES testing PRODUCT good and helpfull for practical reefkeeping ( hobby or public aquaria ), is there a Value to the testing for this purpose. ( Fit for Purpose discussion ) by all informations we have right now ( Article and reality ) ?
2. Is TRITON ICP-OES testing PRODUCT good and helpfull for any other purpose like academic or scientific publications or a legal survey on court ... ?
3. How has TRITON managed to overcome the problems coming with ICP-OES testing of seawater and why is that possible as cheap or at all ?
4. Do the guys from TRITON know what they do ?
5. What does the DATA in the Article realy tell us and wich value does it have for the Reefkeeper, also how much weight does it have acording to the Fit for purpose discussion ?
6. Is there anything that can make the customers of TRITON feel more confident with the testing ? is there any need to feel more confident with TRITON ? what would be the best way to get this confidence ( from the viwe of the reefkeeper )?
7. How accurate / precise is TRITON TESTING PRODUCT and how accurate /precise, for wich purpose it need to be ?
8. Chemical geek questions like is Iodine testing effected by acid ? wich elements will be effected by acid ? in detail wich sideeffects will bacteria, (nano)particles, Matrix diviations/variations... have on the testing.
9. Is there any way that the TRITON TEST PRODUCT user wll be able to determine the accuracy / precision in his own personal TEST matrix ?
I think by going trough a planed discussion like that all of us would be able to contribute better, and the information for the audience will be more informativ.
Please feel free to add anything i could have missed.
I will chime in and start with the first question then.
That's rich. Or perhaps I should say, "that's not Rich."Some people told me that they were told at MACNA that I had changed my mind about Triton. I haven't actually thought much about it since the response we posted earlier in this thread.
More on LODs
The above LODs were compared to the average levels of elements in NSW (Pilson 1998).
What about comparing the LODs to the maximum levels found in NSW (Pilson 1998) …. A more comprehensive list can also be found at a site presented by Randy Holmes Farley at:
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2005-11/rhf/index.php
If one where to run a Triton test on NSW with the maximum concentration of elements found in NSW, Aluminum would enter the detectable range on the Triton ICP Test… Shown in table below.
Also, Triton’s “setpoints” (levels Triton recommends or find acceptable) include Mn, Al, Ni and Zn at levels 12.1x, 1.8x, 7.1x and 6.8x (respectively) higher than the maximums found in NSW. At these setpoint levels these elements are detectable. (Bringing the list of elements that should stay below LOD down to only 12)
So for the 12-16 elements that are below LOD, and desired below LOD, any reading from Triton tests for these 12 to 16 elements would be useful in that it would indicate that there is an excessive metal issue in the Aquarium.
Very useful information IMO.