3D printed objects found to be toxic to fish (2015)

Patx

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
751
Reaction score
566
Location
Montréal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello, i don't know a thing about 3D printing.
But i stupon this article

Is it still "a thing" ?
 

*GAREEF*

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 5, 2024
Messages
689
Reaction score
1,323
Location
Lincolnton
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello, i don't know a thing about 3D printing.
But i stupon this article

Is it still "a thing" ?
Yikes, this is the first I’ve heard about it.
 

Reefer Matt

Reef Cave Dweller
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
7,507
Reaction score
33,423
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It looks like a conclusion without evidence or all the facts. They failed to mention which type of filament was used. Usually petg filament made from an fdm printer is considered reef safe.
 

Js.Aqua.Project

Reef Addict
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
3,688
Location
Ocala, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Doubling what @Reefer Matt said, they didn't specify what FDM material was used so I wouldn't worry or jump the gun yet as ABS and PETG are both common plastics already used elsewhere in the hobby that are also used for 3D printing.

For the STL printing, it is well known that resins are toxic and have to be cured with UV before being handled or used so them doing the test before curing doesn't seem like a test that aligns to industry best practices.
 

Dysprosium

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
18
Reaction score
28
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am a professional chemist, so I looked at the paper they reference and the data doesn't say what this article is spouting.

The FDM and UV-cured SLA prints are well within the error bars of the control, such that it isn't statistically meaningful without a much bigger study. Experimentally, those numbers are all the same.

The uncured SLA samples certinly kill off things, but that's entirely expected and also would be completely abnormal for the process, you UV-cure SLA parts, and rinse with IPA, that's how it is done. The toxicity is clearly due to unpolymerized monomers, which would be expected.

Additionally, this is one of the most sensitive tests which is why it is used, and the conditions - eggs developing directly on the surface - is the highest potential exposure. They did not do a control of the disk on the otherside of an aquarium to check for distance, for example.

In short, this is one paper, the only conclusion is that SLA right-off-the-printer isn't great to breed zebra fish in.
 

Polymate3D

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Messages
178
Reaction score
191
Location
London
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No specialist but one thing to consider to 3D printer users is to stick to FDM for parts, but also try and stick to a hardened or stainless steel nozzle and no filaments with no fillers.

Many hotends are fitted with a brass nozzle and these do wear even with normal PLA or PETG. PETG seems to be the most agreed on material to use and there is no real reason not too. I stick to a stainless steel nozzle myself.

Final thing is to soak in RO water before hand. If you have used any adhesives etc you`ll want to make sure they are removed prior to use.
 

HOW LONG WAS YOUR FISH "MISSING" BEFORE IT REAPPEARED IN YOUR TANK?

  • 1 - 4 days

    Votes: 6 17.6%
  • 4 - 7 days

    Votes: 6 17.6%
  • 1 - 2 weeks

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • 2 - 4 weeks

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • 1 - 2 months

    Votes: 4 11.8%
  • 3 - 6 months

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • 6+ months

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It never reappeared....

    Votes: 8 23.5%
  • Other (Please explain)

    Votes: 3 8.8%
Back
Top