Change in Cycling Technique fishless to fish cycle urgently

ansig

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Location
queensland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
HI All
I am cycling my second tank a Cade S2 1200 which I started to do barebottom with Dr Tims one and only along with ammonia and wait - which I did nearly 4 weeks and the cycle never really cracked on despite plenty of biomedia blocks etc in the sump (lights, UV and skimmer off).

Unfortunately where I was keeping my original fish til this tank was cycled (a clownfish and some chromis) had to leave town on short notice - so I got some sand for my tank (not live sand unfortunately - it is coming still) and redosed with DR Tim's one 4 days ago as thinking I have to do a fish in cycle now. Fish had to go in last night and all look well this morning. Ammonia is 2+ with no nitrites and no nitrates (API)

What do I do now - do I just wait or do I do water changes to get ammonia down (Ph fine) or use prime to keep it in check

any help greatly appreciated as I am a bit confused
Andrew
 

Fish Fan

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
4,011
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately where I was keeping my original fish til this tank was cycled (a clownfish and some chromis) had to leave town on short notice

I'm sorry, did your fish rob a bank??

Just joking, it just caught me as funny. Don't mind me ;-)

Seriously though, I'm not an expert, I'm sure others will be along very soon to offer further advice :)

A bare bottom tank is going to take a bit longer to complete its initial nitrogen cycle compared with a tank that has sand. And, for the first 12-18 months you may see some fluctuating levels, and some issues including an extended "ugly phase".

However, a lot of reefers report that going bare-bottom is easier in the long run, easier to manage detritus, and therefore easier to keep nutrients low. Some report that they have to feed extra or even dose ammonia to keep nitrate and phosphate UP in a bare-bottom tank. Some just do not like the look of a bare-bottom, but others say they will never go back.

You will have to consider that certain fish won't do well without sand. In my research, inverts like Nassarius snails that typically borrow in to the sand bed, do just fine without sand, they hide in the rocks. But some critters may require sand.

I have always used sand, I like the look, but I am currently building an IM 25 Lagoon AIO as a frag tank/invert QT tank, and I'm going sand-less for this tank.

As a suggestion, I ordered a piece of HDPE, which is the material they make "plastic" cutting boards out of. I'm going to put that down under my rock in my bare-bottom tank. It protects the glass from damage by rocks, and though you can keep it "clean", some report that it gets completely covered in coralline, and looks great. I went with 1/4" thick black for my 25 gallon tank. For a larger tank, many suggest 1/2" thick, and it comes in white (which is popular for reef tanks) and other colors too. Something like this:


^^Way too long, I don't blame you for not reading, but to answer your questions more directly:

I would mitigate your high ammonia with water changes at this point. Try as best as you can to match the temp and salinity of your tank, and given that you have only fish at this point, that should work, in my opinion (though concerned for the Anthias).

I fully support and advise a fish-less cycles at this stage of our hobby. But, I'm old enough to remember when using Clownfish to cycle a tank was an accepted and even recommend practice. Although I do think that the high ammonia could potentially damage the gills of your Clownfish, typically they are so hardy that they pull through the cycle reasonably fine.

Your Anthias, I don't know... I like those fish, but I haven't kept one in years... They strike me as a somewhat delicate fish that may not handle +/- 2ppm ammonia, but again, I am not an expert.... Others may be able to offer a more solid opinion here.

Some reefers like these SeaChem Ammonia Alert badges. You can place one of these in your tank as a visual indicator of ammonia, and change water out as needed. Don't be afraid to do a large, near 100% water change, your fish will be fine, in my opinion.


I'd still monitor the tank with a decent (non-API) test kit for ammonia. Many like Salifert for about $15, or many of us use the Hanna Checkers, about $65 new, or you can find them on sale or even used:



I'll add that I really like the Dr. Tim's Aquatics One and Only, I use it and I do recommend it. But, in my opinion, it's not known as "fast acting" here on R2R. From what I've read, many reefers suggest Fritz Turbo Start as the go-to bottled bacteria product, for when you want the fastest possible cycle. If you felt that you had to add another bottled bacteria product, I'd suggest the Fritz Turbo Start:


And pro tip - if you can add even a small chunk of "real" live rock from a quality Local Fish Store (LFS), this would be like putting your tank on steroids, in a good way :)

I hope my reply was helpful, but I'm also confident that you'll get more replies from even more experienced reefers.

As always, I wish yo the best of luck!
 
Last edited:

Fenral

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
23
Reaction score
31
Location
USA, Connecticut , New Canaan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ansig,
I am not sure what you mean by 2+, but if you were doing this as a fishless cycle, the levels are likely long-term toxic to your livestock, which, while hardy, will harm them. You probably should abort: Read several significant water changes in sequence until you get as close to zero as the kits will read. Then, re-dose bacteria and continue with smaller water changes to keep values low and let that bacteria get a hold in your system.
 

polyppal

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Messages
3,305
Reaction score
6,477
Location
Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bare bottom cycles have been a nightmare whenever I've tried it, the sand will help cycle/stabilize things drastically (but it will still take time)

Ammonia dosing likely means its a very toxic environment until it cycles out, I would cut my losses on the salt in the tank, drain almost all of it and add the fish to new water. With a 100g+ tank it will take a while for a couple small fish to ammonia-it-back-up and things might start kicking in on their own by then. No more ammonia dosing!

Fortunately clowns and damsels are pretty tough fish and they'll likely be alright long term if your not seeing issues now.
 

Fish Fan

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
4,011
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ansig,
I am not sure what you mean by 2+, but if you were doing this as a fishless cycle, the levels are likely long-term toxic to your livestock, which, while hardy, will harm them. You probably should abort: Read several significant water changes in sequence until you get as close to zero as the kits will read. Then, re-dose bacteria and continue with smaller water changes to keep values low and let that bacteria get a hold in your system.
Huh???

There is so much here to unpack, if I even understand your reply, and I’m not sure I do.

The OP was indicating that their ammonia was about 2.0ppm. This is very typical when you start and cycle a tank. There’s no reason to “abort” at this time, I’m my opinion.

What do you mean by “zero”? Other than ammonia, there’s nothing in this hobby that modern refers strive for “zero”.

Bare bottom cycles have been a nightmare whenever I've tried it, the sand will help cycle/stabilize things drastically (but it will still take time)
Agreed! I admit I’ve never done a bare-bottom tank, but I’ve been around this hobby a long time, and many do run bare-bottom. I’m doing a lot of research now on the bare-bottom tank I want to start. Yes, it may take longer to stabilize, beyond just the initial nitrogen cycle, but reefers have been running bare-bottom for decades, and many love them.

Ammonia dosing likely means its a very toxic environment until it cycles out, I would cut my losses on the salt in the tank, drain almost all of it and add the fish to new water. With a 100g+ tank it will take a while for a couple small fish to ammonia-it-back-up and things might start kicking in on their own by then. No more ammonia doing.
Why do you say this? You seem like an experienced reefer. I get that a huge water charge is a good idea, but the OP isn’t dosing ammonia for the very cutting edge coral care that we are hearing about from Randy Holmes Farley and other much more experienced reefers than I am. The OP is dosing ammonia to cycle their tank. Am I missing something in your reply? I’m genuinely asking :)

Fortunately clowns and damsels are pretty tough fish and they'll likely be alright long term if you’re not seeing issues now.
Agreed! My bad for thinking the OP had Clowns and Anathias. Clowns and Damsels are the original fish to cycle a tank with, and while I now disagree with this methodology, I do agree that the OP will be fine with these fish through the cycle.

Thanks for your help!
 

Tamberav

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Messages
10,751
Reaction score
16,188
Location
Duluth, MN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Use a better bottled bacteria like turbo start. Fritz 9 is also good but turbo start is faster.

I would just get an appropriate size of turbo start for the gallons and dump that sucker in.

Not all bottled bacteria is equal.
 

Fish Fan

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
4,011
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Use a better bottled bacteria like turbo start. Fritz 9 is also good but turbo start is faster.

I would just get an appropriate size of turbo start for the gallons and dump that sucker in.

Not all bottled bacteria is equal.
Agreed! I’ve said before that I like and use the Dr. Tim’s one and Only, but from what I’ve read hear on R2R, the Fritz Turbo Start is the go-to for the fastest cycle.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

SPS SHOWDOWN! ACROPORA OR MONTIPORA? SHOW OFF YOUR SPS IN THE THREAD!

  • Acros!

    Votes: 49 53.3%
  • Montis!

    Votes: 23 25.0%
  • I'm too torn!

    Votes: 14 15.2%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 6 6.5%
Back
Top