- Joined
- Aug 24, 2016
- Messages
- 1,677
- Reaction score
- 2,582
I see some conclusion which are not correct in my eyes.I have seen maybe 100 N-DOC tests and no one have had a value of over 8.5 ppm TOC in spite of how nutrient rich the aquarium have been and in spite of the use of DOC (alcohol). Among aquarium tested is my own (rather nutrient rich) and a system where PO4 is around 0.4, NO3 around 100 and temp around 12 degree C (low bacterial consumption of organic carbon). Here it was around 12 ppm.
Use (dosing) of ethanol - may in fact lower the concentration of TOC because co-degradation/co-metabolization of persistent OC and labile OC may occur and likely occurs in reef tanks. This can in fact mean lower TOC than in tanks without dosing of labile OC like ethanol, scientific results say.
Nitrate means you have working bacterial degradation (better wording? breakdown?) and whole chains of bacterial degradation. This may not work well if some micronutrients are in short supply. Besides this nitrate is a strong oxidant which itself may support breakdown of TOC. Also sufficient macronutrients like nitrate and phosphate may increase degradation of TOC.
If the bakterial degradation would really be very low, you would hardly have nitrate in your tank. Please remember, one of the strange things in Daniels tank is that also the "N/NO3 calculated" ratio is marked red. This points to severely disturbed bacterial degradation in my eyes.
Maybe, but it doesn't matter as long as phosphate is so low and nearly all essential trace elements including iodine are below the detection limits.I still believe that the nature of the TOC in this case is the main key - fast followed by your suggestions.
Also keep in mind, phosphate calculated from phosphorus from ICP-OES means there is not only no othophosphate but no phosphates at all, no organic, poly, whatsoever phosphates, which could have remained in these states due to lacking bacterial or enzymatic breakdown.
Last edited: