Pros and Cons of Alkalinity and Calcium Dosing Methods

rishma

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
842
Reaction score
637
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Randy Holmes-Farley - thank you! Holy smokes, that was more complicated than I anticipated. I chuckled at the sentence…So now we can use that answer to easily determine the over-addition of calcium. :) Reminded me of a professor.

Would appreciate if you can check some math and logic for me.

For the RMM method I’ve used 2230 ml of kalkwasser in a 100L system adds 20 mg/L of calcium and 1 meq/L alkalinity. (I used the Hamza reef calculator for that but I later checked the J. Dieck reef calculator and it said 2450 ml, I’m not sure which is correct).

So that would be 2000 mg of calcium and 3000 mg of alkalinity added to a 100L tank.

If the demand ratio is more like 3000 alk to 1750 Ca then I need an extra alkalinity to be balanced with the extra 250 mg of calcium. That would be 3000/1750 x 250 =428.6 mg of additional alkalinity needed.

Then I’d add the amount of baking soda or other product to balance it out. Unfortunately, as you previously pointed out to me, the chemistry of kalkwasser is inconvenient so I cannot just add it to the mix and would have to dose separately.

Sound right?
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Randy Holmes-Farley - thank you! Holy smokes, that was more complicated than I anticipated. I chuckled at the sentence…So now we can use that answer to easily determine the over-addition of calcium. :) Reminded me of a professor.

Would appreciate if you can check some math and logic for me.

For the RMM method I’ve used 2230 ml of kalkwasser in a 100L system adds 20 mg/L of calcium and 1 meq/L alkalinity. (I used the Hamza reef calculator for that but I later checked the J. Dieck reef calculator and it said 2450 ml, I’m not sure which is correct).

So that would be 2000 mg of calcium and 3000 mg of alkalinity added to a 100L tank.

If the demand ratio more like 3000 alk to 1750 Ca then I need an extra alkalinity to be balanced with the extra 250 mg of calcium. That would be 3000/1750 x 250 =428.6 mg of additional alkalinity needed.

Then I’d add the amount of baking soda or other product to balance it out. Unfortunately, as you previously pointed out to me, the chemistry of kalkwasser is inconvenient so I cannot just add it to the mix and would have to dose separately.

Sound right?

The potency difference between calculators might be a temperature issue for what saturation is attained, but at 25 deg C, kalkwasser at full saturation is a known pH standard and contains ~ 0.0204 M calcium, and 0.0408 eq of alkalinity. ~816 ppm (mg/L) calcium. More dissolves at lower temp. Might also be an error in one of them.

2.230 Liters of kalk adds 1.82 grams of calcium.

If we assume the excess calcium is 10% (I calculated 12% in the above data, but 10% is close enough and may be more accurate in a heavy coral tank) then the excess calcium is 0.18 grams calcium.

0.18 grams of calcium combines with about 1.5 times as much carbonate (0.27 g) to make pure calcium carbonate. That amount is present in 0.48 grams of sodium carbonate.

Thus, you'd add roughly a half gram of sodium carbonate per day.

I'd use less if coralline is not a main component of alk demand.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I might just add that the powder version of AFR is around $7/L, quite a bit more affordable than the liquid, even if a pain to mix.
Yes, it is certainly true that one can reduce the costs of some of these by starting with powders or using larger containers.

AFR powder is not cheaper than carbocalcium (the alk and calcium part of AFR), so it will still be orange in the charge (but not red). :)
 

rishma

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
842
Reaction score
637
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The potency difference between calculators might be a temperature issue for what saturation is attained, but at 25 deg C, kalkwasser at full saturation is a known pH standard and contains ~ 0.0204 M calcium, and 0.0408 meq of alkalinity. ~816 ppm (mg/L) calcium. More dissolves at lower temp. Might also be an error in one of them.

2.230 Liters of kalk adds 1.82 grams of calcium.

If we assume the excess calcium is 10% (I calculated 12% in the above data, but 10% is close enough and may be more accurate in a heavy coral tank) then the excess calcium is 0.18 grams calcium.

0.18 grams of calcium combines with about 1.5 times as much carbonate (0.27 g) to make pure calcium carbonate. That amount is present in 0.48 grams of sodium carbonate.

Thus, you'd add roughly a half gram of sodium carbonate per day.

I'd use less if coralline is not a main component of alk demand.
Thanks you. I’m a little lost in the units I think. Perhaps I need another cup of coffee. I don’t do much math these days.

Regarding this statement… full saturation is a known pH standard and contains ~ 0.0204 M calcium, and 0.0408 meq of alkalinity. ~816 ppm (mg/L) calcium.

So 816 mg/L Ca means 2450 ml of Kalk added to a 100L tank will add 20 ppm (mg/L) calcium. Is that also adding 1 meq/L (2.8 dKH) and alkalinity? I don’t understand the 0.0408 meq of alkalinity.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks you. I’m a little lost in the units I think. Perhaps I need another cup of coffee. I don’t do much math these days.

Regarding this statement… full saturation is a known pH standard and contains ~ 0.0204 M calcium, and 0.0408 meq of alkalinity. ~816 ppm (mg/L) calcium.

So 816 mg/L Ca means 2450 ml of Kalk added to a 100L tank will add 20 ppm (mg/L) calcium. Is that also adding 1 meq/L (2.8 dKH) and alkalinity? I don’t understand the 0.0408 meq of alkalinity.

Sorry, the alk should have read 0.0408 eq of alkalinty, not meq. That is 40.8 meq. Put that in 100 L, and it boosts alk by 2.45 l X 0.408 meq/L, or 2.8 dKH.

816 mg/L of calcium x 2.45 Liters dosed / 100 L final volume = 20 ppm calcium.
 

rishma

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
842
Reaction score
637
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sorry, the alk should have read 0.0408 eq of alkalinty, not meq. That is 40.8 meq. Put that in 100 L, and it boosts alk by 2.45 l X 0.408 meq/L, or 2.8 dKH.

816 mg/L of calcium x 2.45 Liters dosed / 100 L final volume = 20 ppm calcium.
Thank you for patiently walking through that with me. I’m going to ponder this some more.
 

Corolling

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Randy, great post! As for the cost, I'm under the understanding that esv although most expensive, has more trace elements in it from the factory. Also, I read on esv website that you shouldn't have to add mag since alk and cal mixture has it already. Any truth to that?
 

smallcrpt

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
41
Reaction score
38
Location
Orange
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know you said you have your kalk mix in your ATO set up. Have you had to replace your pumps over time faster than what would be considered normal?
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Randy, great post! As for the cost, I'm under the understanding that esv although most expensive, has more trace elements in it from the factory. Also, I read on esv website that you shouldn't have to add mag since alk and cal mixture has it already. Any truth to that?

I address those issues here, but the upshot is you need more trace elements if you intend to offset demand:

 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know you said you have your kalk mix in your ATO set up. Have you had to replace your pumps over time faster than what would be considered normal?

I used a diaphragm pump that lasted as long as I used it (many years).
 

Koty

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
865
Reaction score
729
Location
Rehovot Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you very much, Randy, for this great article (It should be a chapter in a book :cool:).
You accurately distilled all the pros and cons of all dosing methods.
With the three-part Balling system, there are annoying salinity and Ca creep-ups (Especially to no WC tanks)
Can the latter be fixed by adding MgCl2 and maybe even StCl2 to the Ca container based on known rations in the coral skeleton? I understand that every tank is different and many critters precipitate Ca/Alk, but this will at least minimize the Ca creep-up. Another idea is to dilute the CaCl2 relative to the alkalinity concentration (This will slightly mess with the Na/Cl Ratios that the 3rd container should compensate for).
Thanks
 

rishma

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
842
Reaction score
637
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The potency difference between calculators might be a temperature issue for what saturation is attained, but at 25 deg C, kalkwasser at full saturation is a known pH standard and contains ~ 0.0204 M calcium, and 0.0408 eq of alkalinity. ~816 ppm (mg/L) calcium. More dissolves at lower temp. Might also be an error in one of them.

2.230 Liters of kalk adds 1.82 grams of calcium.

If we assume the excess calcium is 10% (I calculated 12% in the above data, but 10% is close enough and may be more accurate in a heavy coral tank) then the excess calcium is 0.18 grams calcium.

0.18 grams of calcium combines with about 1.5 times as much carbonate (0.27 g) to make pure calcium carbonate. That amount is present in 0.48 grams of sodium carbonate.

Thus, you'd add roughly a half gram of sodium carbonate per day.

I'd use less if coralline is not a main component of alk demand.
Ok, I thought about this some more. To make it simple for those of us using kalkwasser and/or AFR with excess calcium, to keep calcium from creeping up we could dose about 10% of our alkalinity with an alkalinity-only source like sodium carbonate.

Do I have that right?
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok, I thought about this some more. To make it simple for those of us using kalkwasser and/or AFR with excess calcium, to keep calcium from creeping up we could dose about 10% of our alkalinity with an alkalinity-only source like sodium carbonate.

Do I have that right?

Yes, with the amount (5%, 10%, etc) depending mostly on the degree of coralline growth relative to hard corals (and water changes). As I’ve noted, I solved the problem by just doing normal water changes with a lower calcium salt mix.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you very much, Randy, for this great article (It should be a chapter in a book :cool:).
You accurately distilled all the pros and cons of all dosing methods.
With the three-part Balling system, there are annoying salinity and Ca creep-ups (Especially to no WC tanks)
Can the latter be fixed by adding MgCl2 and maybe even StCl2 to the Ca container based on known rations in the coral skeleton? I understand that every tank is different and many critters precipitate Ca/Alk, but this will at least minimize the Ca creep-up. Another idea is to dilute the CaCl2 relative to the alkalinity concentration (This will slightly mess with the Na/Cl Ratios that the 3rd container should compensate for).
Thanks

Calcium creep should not be an issue with a 2 or three part, but if it is, can you just use less if the calcium part?
 

Koty

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
865
Reaction score
729
Location
Rehovot Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. that will work however, it makes a mess with the routine of filling and preparing the solutions. I guess I will use a slightly diluted CaCl2 to slowly reduce the Ca back to natural levels.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. that will work however, it makes a mess with the routine of filling and preparing the solutions. I guess I will use a slightly diluted CaCl2 to slowly reduce the Ca back to natural levels.

That would also work.

What two part are you using?
 

smallcrpt

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
41
Reaction score
38
Location
Orange
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, with the amount (5%, 10%, etc) depending mostly on the degree of coralline growth relative to hard corals (and water changes). As I’ve noted, I solved the problem by just doing normal water changes with a lower calcium salt mix.
I'm currently doing AWC with tropic Marin salt and my calcium has been creeping higher. If I switch to IO, do you recommend dosing trace elements? Or should they be ok with kalk and io?
I was using io Orange bucket but thought the fancy TM salt would help with growth.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
73,370
Reaction score
71,501
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm currently doing AWC with tropic Marin salt and my calcium has been creeping higher. If I switch to IO, do you recommend dosing trace elements? Or should they be ok with kalk and io?
I was using io Orange bucket but thought the fancy TM salt would help with growth.

How are you dosing alk and calcium?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HAS AN ANEMONE EVER CAUSED TROUBLE IN YOUR TANK?

  • Yes! I no longer keep them in my aquarium.

    Votes: 18 24.7%
  • Yes! But I love mine and still keep them in my aquarium.

    Votes: 18 24.7%
  • No. My anemone has been on its best behavior.

    Votes: 14 19.2%
  • No. I've never had an anemone in my aquarium.

    Votes: 18 24.7%
  • Other (Please explain).

    Votes: 5 6.8%
Back
Top