Unofficial ReefBot and App Suggestion Tracker

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Reef Kinetics

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
501
Reaction score
365
Location
Beirut, Lebanon


UPDATE:

1- Unfortunately, Hanna reagents won't be compatible due to long-term viability issues with powder reagents on the ReefBot.

2- Starting with Batch #6, we'll gradually replace 3D-printed parts with more durable materials. Some parts may require time due to mold preparation.

3- We won't pursue a larger testing chamber for probes due to current model constraints. Instead, we'll focus on probe integration in the upcoming year for all ReefBot Lab models whether old or new.

4- All application-related modifications mentioned and others will be modified in the upcoming period to have a more user-friendly dashboard.

5- API-Access is on hold for the ReefBot Lab until after Batch #6, but it's a serious topic for future consideration.

6- The concept of a smaller device with fewer tests is similar to the classic ReefBot that came with 8 vial slots, if we were to dedicate a device for Nitrates and Phosphates only we would require at least 6 vial slots to accommodate most of the test kits on the market that come with 3 reagents for each. There are always new product ideas and projects that the R&D team is working on, and a similar model is definitely one of them, but not anytime soon.

Thank you, Frank, for your ongoing feedback. We value every suggestion.

Best regards,
 

MyFirstCar

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2022
Messages
201
Reaction score
153
Location
Toronto
I'd love if the app could clarify what the difference between red sea alk high resolution vs red sea pro alk is, and if they both can use the same test kit?

I'd also love the ability to set a stirring test for any vial, not just the built in ones
 
OP
OP
Inamo

Inamo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
137
Reaction score
83
Location
Crestview
I'd love if the app could clarify what the difference between red sea alk high resolution vs red sea pro alk is, and if they both can use the same test kit?

I'd also love the ability to set a stirring test for any vial, not just the built in ones
I will add these to the tracker. The latter was something I mentioned a couple times myself.

The app/dashboard could use refinement. For instance when I use Red Sea to test for Calcium (which I don't recommend, nor will i use again after this kit) I have to mix a powder with a liquid reagents. It would be nice if the app provided the details. I have to go search for it in their help section each time to make sure I remember correctly, and the article is from 2022 when it was Beta. So I hope it wasn't updated.

To answer your first question, yes they are both from the same reagents. One will provide a higher resolution. An example, is the high res vs normal mag test. If I remember correctly the normal will give results in 100s, where as high res will give it in 10s.
 

MyFirstCar

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2022
Messages
201
Reaction score
153
Location
Toronto
To answer your first question, yes they are both from the same reagents. One will provide a higher resolution. An example, is the high res vs normal mag test. If I remember correctly the normal will give results in 100s, where as high res will give it in 10s.
Interesting, my high resolution gives very different numbers to my low resolution

IMG_6629.png


Overall, the apps design and the manual could use a fair bit of work. I find a lot of the language unclear/confusing, and the instructions for working with powder reagents aren't there at all. I'm a real fan of the unit itself, and understand they're a startup that's learning, but I feel like I'm constantly emailing support to ask how things work.
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
9,447
We recognize the advantages of having the device operate independently, even in "offline" mode. While our reliance on the cloud has streamlined processes and offered numerous benefits, we anticipate reducing this dependency in the future. We understand that many users express interest in this transition, but it's worth noting that these users form a somewhat specialized niche. As of now, we haven't found that enabling this feature outweighs the potential drawbacks given how our device currently functions.
This device is a boat anchor without an internet connection. User's who wish to have a device that works independent of an always-on connection are NOT a niche.


It's important to acknowledge that we did encounter some issues in the past years, particularly when certain tests failed due to communication problems.
This is still happening.

Operating the device without relying on the cloud is a concept we're actively exploring, and it's something we're committed to implementing eventually. While we don't foresee it happening in the immediate future, it is a transition that we're dedicated to making in due course.
A year has passed... Can this become a priority please?
 

BeanAnimal

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
9,447
Hello Erric, this requires a firmware change that we are working on for next year's batch as promised by Hady during his live Q&A. We will then provide the update image to our users that would like to flash it on their device's SD cards
A year has passed - why is this simple code change not implemented?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top