KH/ Alk which to trust?

UMALUM

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 7, 2023
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,006
Location
Fl.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't have a hanna so I can't honestly pick between the two, but your results maybe closer than you think. If I'm not mistaken I read somewhere that the Salifert results should be gathered at the point the vile turns violet and not pink, red, orange, ect. If this is the case and you didn't take that adjustment into account then maybe they'll match?
 

gbroadbridge

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
4,585
Reaction score
4,881
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Salifert test result - 8.9
Hanna - 7.8

Which to trust?
Depends on a couple of things.

The Hanna Alk reagent is only really good for about a month after opening - after 3 months it reads very low unless stored refrigerated - probably due to oxidation of the reagent.

The salifert test effectively never expires however as pointed out above, the titration endpoint is not when the sample is completely pink, but when it is halfway there - a purple color.

Used consistently, I'd put my money on the salifert.
 
OP
OP
legacy2mj

legacy2mj

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
385
Reaction score
124
Location
Lone Tree, Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends on a couple of things.

The Hanna Alk reagent is only really good for about a month after opening - after 3 months it reads very low unless stored refrigerated - probably due to oxidation of the reagent.

The salifert test effectively never expires however as pointed out above, the titration endpoint is not when the sample is completely pink, but when it is halfway there - a purple color.

Used consistently, I'd put my money on the salifert.
Interesting. The Hanna test kit is pretty new. I would say 1 month old (to me)…. I did not know this about the color on salifert, I have stopped my dips at pink. So these results may be much closer than I originally thought. I use a mag stir device for my vials. So I will retry this comparison and stop the reading prior to a solid pink. Appreciate the response.
 

TangerineSpeedo

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 8, 2022
Messages
2,793
Reaction score
4,392
Location
SoCal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Couple things, Yes the reagent can get oxidized, but yours should be good, but yes I have seen it go bad.
Also if you are using a mag stirrer (Bless these little things) once you get the color, stop the stirrer and see if it stays that color. This goes with other tests like Calcium. This has been my experiences anyway.
 
OP
OP
legacy2mj

legacy2mj

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
385
Reaction score
124
Location
Lone Tree, Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Couple things, Yes the reagent can get oxidized, but yours should be good, but yes I have seen it go bad.
Also if you are using a mag stirrer (Bless these little things) once you get the color, stop the stirrer and see if it stays that color. This goes with other tests like Calcium. This has been my experiences anyway.
I 100% agree. I notice this the most with my Mag test. I have learned to let things work for a few seconds before continuing with that. But I will make an effort to do this “pause” technique with the others and see how things differ. Luckily I do monthly ICP tests, so I would know if things are way out of bounds. Just want to maintain the most consistency inbetween. Since I don’t run a controller of any kind it’s up to me and diligence to keep an eye on it all.
 

Pod_01

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
1,103
Location
Waterloo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Salifert test result - 8.9
Hanna - 7.8

Which to trust?
So do 3 test with Salifert and 3 test with Hanna. Average all results and that is your number….

Since the two are within 1dKh I say your value is 8.4…. and call it a day. 8.4 dKh is good in my book and so is 8.9 and 7.8.

You can get two more tests kits to really have some fun with statistics.

Good luck,
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,235
Reaction score
69,908
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I 100% agree. I notice this the most with my Mag test. I have learned to let things work for a few seconds before continuing with that. But I will make an effort to do this “pause” technique with the others and see how things differ. Luckily I do monthly ICP tests, so I would know if things are way out of bounds. Just want to maintain the most consistency inbetween. Since I don’t run a controller of any kind it’s up to me and diligence to keep an eye on it all.

I personally do not think turning off the stirring makes chemical sense, but allowing time for each drop of titrant to chemically react before deciding if more is needed is important.
 

dwest

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
4,605
Reaction score
9,586
Location
Northern KY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It doesn’t really matter if you run your tank at 8 or 9 dKH. Pick a test kit and try to keep alkalinity consistent.

I used salifert for many years and now use Hanna for convenience and my reducing ability to see color changes well.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Messages
271
Reaction score
235
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I go by salifert for almost all tests I've found them to be the only consistent tester.

But hanna is close enough where I would still feel safe if I ran out of salifert.

Yesterday mine was
hanna- 7.9
Salifert 8.1
seachem- 7.8

My alk is usually stable between 7.9-8.1

The lowest I've seen it drop was 7.5 on the hanna.
 

TangerineSpeedo

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 8, 2022
Messages
2,793
Reaction score
4,392
Location
SoCal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I personally do not think turning off the stirring makes chemical sense, but allowing time for each drop of titrant to chemically react before deciding if more is needed is important.
For example: If I am doing a titration test for CA and introducing reagent a drop at a time when the solution goes from pink to blue. If I stop to mixer at that time the solution will turn back to pink. It is usually one or two drops after that that it stays blue.
So yes I agree with you that the reagent needs time to react but something with the spinning of the solution gives it a early false positive. Give it a whirl (pun intended) see if you have the same results...
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
72,235
Reaction score
69,908
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’m just saying that the only effect of stirring on chemistry is to make and keep the solution homogeneous. Stirring will never slow any ordinary reaction, and it never causes things to happen that don’t already happen without stirring.
 

michigan-reef

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 5, 2022
Messages
50
Reaction score
24
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I personally trust the Salifert test. I would do three separate tests with the Salifert to make sure you are performing the test the same every time, if so just trust it.

I have bought two Hanna checkers, one failed after about a year and I don't trust the other one anymore. I do believe they were accurate when they were new.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH OF THESE CREEPY REEF CRITTERS IS MOST LIKELY TO GIVE YOU NIGHTMARES? (PICTURED IN THE THREAD)

  • The Bobbit Worm

    Votes: 50 66.7%
  • The Goblin Shark

    Votes: 4 5.3%
  • The Sea Wolf

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Giant Spider Crabs

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • The Stargazer Fish

    Votes: 5 6.7%
  • The Giant Isopod

    Votes: 9 12.0%
  • The Giant Squid

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Other (Please explain!)

    Votes: 5 6.7%
Back
Top