Pros vs Cons: Wet Skimming vs Dry Skimming

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,851
Reaction score
87,890
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
versus-5.jpg


In my local club there was always a debate about Wet Skimming vs Dry Skimming with your protein skimmer. I would say that there are good and bad for either.

The traditional thought is this.

1. Wet Skimming skims faster but the skimmate is less concentrated.

2. Dry Skimming is slower but the skimmate is more concentrated.

How do you skim and what would you say are the pros and cons of each?
 

Zoanthkid

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
174
Reaction score
24
Location
grand rapids, mi
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'd say middle of the road with my CPR... it pulls out a light colored skimmate with "chunks" of more solid sludge floating around in the cup.
 

impur

GO DUCKS!!!
View Badges
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
1,393
Reaction score
64
Location
Eugene OR
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think there are other variables like type of skimmer you are using. I previously used an Octopus skimmer when they first came out and I did wet skimming. Now with my SWC skimmer, dry skimming works better.
 

mega_mike

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
46
Reaction score
10
Location
Eureka CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Dry skim dug! Because its what the pros do plus it dosent take unnessicary water leading to more top offs!
 
OP
OP
revhtree

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,851
Reaction score
87,890
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Bump!
 

Pkunk35

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
1,127
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would think Dry skimming to be more efficient, but might not wet skim pull out more "junk" overall since it is pulling so much skim out?

Blech but who wants to empty cups of skimmate all the time? I def vote dry skim.
 

lakeviewink

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
906
Reaction score
14
Location
Petoskey, Mi
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I used to wet skim but it affected my salinity and ato too much. I didn't see any advantage to it, now its dry baby.......
 

Young Frankenstein

I sniff ozone and relax.
View Badges
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
1,153
Reaction score
125
Location
South Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Better skimming = wet skimming for me, just add some saltwater to make up, considering my skimmer is connected to a output waist tube, no containers.
 

caudill187

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
1,904
Reaction score
20
Location
New Orleans
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I skim on the dry side unless I have a reason to try and get stuff out of the tank more quickly (water treatments, etc.)
 

Dublo8

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
34
Reaction score
8
Location
San Tan Valley
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
it affected my salinity and ato too much.

Yes, it can throw off your salinity by a good margin, especially on a smaller tank. I still like to skim a little on the wetter side though. It seems to be more effective at removing organics. The rate of removal is a little faster as well.
 

Electrobes

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
2,089
Reaction score
255
Location
Fort Myers, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 40Br and I've always skimmed wet. It's never affected my salinity by much or really any, if/when it did it was easily corrected with a water change. It just seems more effective to skim wet, catch as much as the skimmer can grab and avoid any of the funk getting thrown back into the tank.
 

slice

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
101
Reaction score
5
Location
Cary, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"Fish Butter"..LOL, I can smell it now...

I have my CPR set to skim as wet as possible. I'm sumpless with an HOB skimmer/fuge combo, so I need the skimmer to collect as much crap as it can. I feel wet skimming gives a better chance for the bubbles to get the chunks all the way up the neck and into the cup.

I still get plenty of "Fish Butter" deposited inside the neck and on the underside of the cup lid.
 

sven.fischre.de

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Location
Germany - Berlin
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi,

depends on fish only, mixed or coral I guess.

As skimming removes not just the unwanted ingedients for corals, some like to get a little dirty water. If you have just SPS, it's better to get prestine water quality by wet skimming.
In a fish only tank, especially much fish in small tanks, poor water quality is always present growing algae. So I think wet skimming is necessary.
In mixed tanks and if the corals need some nutrients, better try dry skimming...

Sven
 

Kbra

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
3
Location
San Luis Obispo, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Dry skimming here. Ive heard that wet skimming defeats the purpose of a skimmer and doesnt get the micro particles you would get from the foaming. Just what i heard. Nothing to back that though...
 

pickupman66

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,032
Reaction score
1,166
Location
Winchester, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IM sort of a happy medium, but my MRC seems to perform best when dry skimming. it will build up a TON of "fish butter" on the top rim of the throat and the lid giving just a little water into the cup or the collection bucket. it is way too touchy to wet skim as it can overflow quickly and throw out 5 gallons of water quickly. it is cleaned monthly or so.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 72 35.5%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 7 3.4%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 52 25.6%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 64 31.5%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 3.9%
Back
Top