Best biological media for sump / refugium

schooncw

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
754
Reaction score
571
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I say my nitrate is off the chart, It's not 0, it's way HIGH off the chart and if you want to reduce nitrate, you must have minimal flow for anaerobic bacteria. I think the MP blocks are getting too much flow, thus, nitrate.
 

BOWHUNTER4250

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
433
Reaction score
185
Location
ILLINOIS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I say my nitrate is off the chart, It's not 0, it's way HIGH off the chart and if you want to reduce nitrate, you must have minimal flow for anaerobic bacteria. I think the MP blocks are getting too much flow, thus, nitrate.

I don't know about that ? i get what your saying about flow but im pushing roughly 4700 gph thru my sump , i have a power head in my sump to keep detritus from building up blowing the opposite direction as my flow , in the picture you can see the compartment i made to hold the Siporax , that was 50L when i set up my tank , im down to 2 rows of that and i cant get ANY measurable readings of No3 or Po4 , now my Bio load is on the smaller side for the size tank i have ( 300 display & 220 sump)
i can add more back in if needed ........ flow thru these is pretty quick ?

siporax #3.jpg
 

schooncw

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
754
Reaction score
571
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So, the flow in the compartment with Siporax is high? Really? Aerobic bacteria does not consume nitrate, it creates it! That is a large stack and if you don't have a powerhead in that section, I don't see how you could NOT have anaerobic, nitrate consuming bacteria. My MP blocks are too large to fit anywhere else in my sump, which is another reason I am considering siporax….it small enough to fit in a no flow area
 

BOWHUNTER4250

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
433
Reaction score
185
Location
ILLINOIS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So, the flow in the compartment with Siporax is high? Really? Aerobic bacteria does not consume nitrate, it creates it! That is a large stack and if you don't have a powerhead in that section, I don't see how you could NOT have anaerobic, nitrate consuming bacteria. My MP blocks are too large to fit anywhere else in my sump, which is another reason I am considering siporax….it small enough to fit in a no flow area

Im using a Reefflo - Hammerhead / Barracuda Gold pump with a wide open gate valve , at Zero head that pushes approx. 6300 GPH , im at approx. 11' head so im estimating around 4500/4700 GPH ... so no matter where the Siporax is in my sump this much water has to pass thru it / over it etc.......
 

schooncw

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
754
Reaction score
571
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If that's the case, I believe that your low PO/Nitrate is the result of good husbandry, lower bio load, etc. If your siporax is being blasted, it is not cultivating anaerobic, nitrate consuming bacteria.
 

Jimmyneptune

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
418
Reaction score
285
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been wanting to start siporax. I have a 120 gallon mixed reef system with a No3 of 50 and a Po4 of 1.2, which I got to .65 with lanthanum chloride dose. I would like to get my numbers down, not 0, but just so they can be normal or a little bit above normal. I was planing on making a basket out of egg crate and placing in my sump
Any ideas on how much I should use and where to get the siporax?
 

AdamB

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,069
Reaction score
4,032
Location
Asheville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i'll put a vote in for seachem matrix and siporax.

been using them in combination for a long time.

i have them both in separate reactors and every few months i'll disconnect the reactors, give them a shake, dump the water with mulm, then refill with fresh salt mix & put back on line.

i tried marine pure blocks a while back and they turned to mush and crumbled when i tried to move them. made quite the mess in my sump so i stay away from them.
Second that on matrix.
 

siggy

My Aquariums Going Again
View Badges
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
7,124
Reaction score
21,423
Location
MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I placed my bio-media in the corner overflow chamber. The bottom has basically no flow and the top has 10x. In the end I only had 3 large rocks in the tank and zero nutrients.
As for the Best? I was using Marine-Pure Spheres and would use it again. BTW several ICP tests and no Aluminum
 

BOWHUNTER4250

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
433
Reaction score
185
Location
ILLINOIS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been wanting to start siporax. I have a 120 gallon mixed reef system with a No3 of 50 and a Po4 of 1.2, which I got to .65 with lanthanum chloride dose. I would like to get my numbers down, not 0, but just so they can be normal or a little bit above normal. I was planing on making a basket out of egg crate and placing in my sump
Any ideas on how much I should use and where to get the siporax?

Google search Siporax , easy to find , i ended up taking most of mine out as i started with way too much , 1 litre will filter 265 U.S gallons , i used 500liters for 425 gallons and stripped it too clean . You can get 1 liter and use half in a reactor , mesh bag , etc..... it will take a good month plus to start " seeding " the siporax
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

SHOULD MANDARIN GOBIES BE LEFT FOR MORE EXPERIENCED HOBBYISTS? WHY OR WHY NOT?

  • Yes, they are difficult to care for & should be left for more experienced reefers.

    Votes: 23 31.5%
  • They can be challenging to care for, but I think successful care is possible for a new reefer.

    Votes: 34 46.6%
  • No, they are not too difficult to care for & most reefers can successfully care for them.

    Votes: 11 15.1%
  • No, they are not difficult to care for & I believe any level reefer can be successful with them.

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 1 1.4%
Back
Top