CCFL 253nm Technology

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
3,771
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seems LED still a ways out but do these CCFL show any promise as advertised because I'm getting confused as to this specific bulb technology being deployed by Fluval having said 100% UV-C or not. Due to how compact they are would make plumbing much easier and supposedly longer useful life according to Fluval. Haven't seen them provide any proof of any of their claims. Not that they haven't. Just not seen by me.
100% or 90% makes little difference.
To get 100% you just need to filter out the 10% "other" light .;)
I haven't actually seen any side by side spectral comparison between cold cathode and normal fluorescent UV-C bulbs showing the spectrum over the range of Interest in order to make the sort of comparison to say that one is far more efficient than the other.
Maybe @oreo54 has seen something that shows the goods.
The main point of the cold cathode is just to extend the bulbs lifespan.
Doubt if efficiency has much to do with things though they do say they are more efficient... Meaning more photons/watt so one can use less watts.. :)

And dimmabilty.
Thought this was funny ..
 
OP
OP
GARRIGA

GARRIGA

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
3,576
Location
South Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
100% or 90% makes little difference.
To get 100% you just need to filter out the 10% "other" light .;)
But does that mean one then gets 6w of UV-C as advertised? That’s what I’m trying to verify.

Unlike Pentair bulbs that show both total wattage and UV-C this item claims 100% UV-C at 6 wats and they confirmed total wattage also 6. Sounds to good to be true but then I’m not a light expert.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
3,771
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But does that mean one then gets 6w of UV-C as advertised? That’s what I’m trying to verify.

Unlike Pentair bulbs that show both total wattage and UV-C this item claims 100% UV-C at 6 wats and they confirmed total wattage also 6. Sounds to good to be true but then I’m not a light expert.
There are always going to be losses.
"I" would assume 6 watts is the bulbs total watts.
2w of actual light 1.9w of actual UV-C...
As a guess-timate.
As to spectrum, will depend on pressure inside the tube and any phosphor conversion.
uv-lamp-output.gif

It's not easy getting all the engineering specs of this "stuff".
Using general assumptions is about all one can do most of the time.
Doesn't appear that cc lamps are orders of magnitude more efficient

UV-C lamps/fixture for the pet industry can play fast and loose with "stuff" since it's not public health type of issue where more rigid parameters apply.

Well just found out more efficiency does not mean more UV.
I got suspicious with the table in the link above. Looked like the CC was 1/2 the output of a hot cathode lamp.
Which was 1/2 the output of an HO UV lamp..

Cold-cathode UV lamps provide less UV-C output than hot-cathode UV lamps, but consume less energy and can potentially last several thousand hours longer, thus requiring less maintenance.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
GARRIGA

GARRIGA

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
3,576
Location
South Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are always going to be losses.
"I" would assume 6 watts is the bulbs total watts.
2w of actual light 1.9w of actual UV-C...
As a guess-timate.
As to spectrum, will depend on pressure inside the tube and any phosphor conversion.
uv-lamp-output.gif

It's not easy getting all the engineering specs of this "stuff".
Using general assumptions is about all one can do most of the time.
Doesn't appear that cc lamps are orders of magnitude more efficient

UV-C lamps/fixture for the pet industry can play fast and loose with "stuff" since it's not public health type of issue where more rigid parameters apply.

Well just found out more efficiency does not mean more UV.
I got suspicious with the table in the link above. Looked like the CC was 1/2 the output of a hot cathode lamp.
Which was 1/2 the output of an HO UV lamp..
Is there an affordable way to measure just how much UV-C is produced? Seems based on what you stated these CCFL are getting less than two watts of actual UVC output. Although your last statement sounds as if based off efficiency that might need to be cut in half if I understood that correctly.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
3,771
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is there an affordable way to measure just how much UV-C is produced? Seems based on what you stated these CCFL are getting less than two watts of actual UVC output. Although your last statement sounds as if based off efficiency that might need to be cut in half if I understood that correctly.
Yesh my assumption was wrong.
I assumed they numbered bulbs in a semi normal way.

A 782 L 10 cc lamp is 10 watts total

It isn't....it's apparently 20 watts
Screenshot_20250225-074635.png

American Ultraviolet GML120 782VH10 - 20W - Single Pin - 357mm - Cold Cathode - Ozone
$89.95
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
3,771
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yesh my assumption was wrong.
I assumed they numbered bulbs in a semi normal way.

A 782 L 10 cc lamp is 10 watts total

It isn't....it's apparently 20 watts
Screenshot_20250225-074635.png

If the efficiency is relatively equal across lamp types yea that 8w is like 1.2w of UV.
More as-u-me- ing
8w hot cathode is 2.4 w uv- c.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

SEAHORSES VS. PIPEFISH! WHICH DO YOU PREFER?

  • Seahorses!

    Votes: 21 51.2%
  • Pipefish!

    Votes: 12 29.3%
  • This is too hard!

    Votes: 8 19.5%
Back
Top