I think your right!
Rev, you are a very experienced zoa keeper, I have enjoyed your pictures for a long time, but I have to disagree with you. The reason why fish and other hard to keep animals die is usually because or mal nutrition. This seems to be a case of disease. I think we can all agree that some types of zoas are more prone to infection than others, a prime example is radioactive dragon eyes. I have seen more zoa pox cases pertaining to this strain than any other type. I have also saved colonies of hundreds of them with one dip in furan 2.
For example dragonettes....one type isnt any easier to keep than the other. This goes for other types of animals as well. Just because we gave this zoa a fancy name and a high price tag doesnt mean its requirements are any different from the hundreds of other types we keep. It just doesnt add up, it simply cannot be so similar and as some claim, "unique" in its care requirements at the same time.
I have personally never had the pleasure of keeping armegeddons, but I would happily if given the chance. I am also fairly certain I could do it successfully.
Let me ask you all this, out of every one here who has lost these zoas, have even one of you attempted a furan 2 dip before the colony's demise?
Furan 2 should be a go to for zoa problems just like iodine is a go to for SPS problems. The fact is it simply doesnt hurt healthy polyps, and has been proven time and time again to solve many zoanthid problems, both known like the pox, and other that dont necessarily show symptoms, although I feel that the same disease that prduce the white lesions can manifest itself without any outward signs other than closed polyps.
so why do you think most elegance corals 10 years ago were easy to keep, but now no one can seem to keep them alive in home aquariums?
b/c the theory is they were over collected from shallow water areas, and the ones that now come in are from deeper waters. there are temperature, pressure, and lighting issues here that do not fit into your disease theory.
there has been no real record of anyone keeping armagedons successfully to the point of growing out a mini-colony. so why is it so impossible to think they came from very deepwaters? same as current elegance corals do?
its highly doubtful 90% of the people who have tried to keep armagedons and have them die, lost them due to infection when 100% of their other zoas have no signs of any sort of disease. unless of course, this zoa species has basically no sort of "immune system" when compared to other zoas that thrive in the same tanks.
Another little bit of food for thought . . .
Since the concept of all zoas are the same has been brought up, I'll throw in some info about human susceptibility to infectious diseases. Its been shown that genetic variations can make people susceptible to certain diseases (leprosy and chronic hepatis B virus persistence for example). Most of the human population is not at risk for these diseases, but certain individuals with particular genetic variations are at risk. You could be married to a leper and never develop leprosy yourself, but your children would be at risk since they can inherit the gene that makes your spouse susceptible.
So while people are mostly the same, and zoas are mostly the same, they're not all exactly the same. In the case of Armagedons, hobbyists have been spreading around a clonal lineage with the same genetic makeup. It may have a genetic mutation that makes it susceptible to a disease that wouldn't otherwise infect other zoas.
I hope that makes sense and isn't too confusing. Just something else to think about. I like Anthony's idea as well, it's something that we come across is culturing cells in the lab. You can only culture them for so long before they crap out.
i hear nothing but crickets.....:hammer:
Last edited: