This was my post a few minutes ago.....I really don't care at this point wether it ticks anybody off. they are cool with all of these other clubs and avatars but ours ......
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recognizing that it is impossible to construct a definition which will satisfy every situation or circumstance, Reef Central reserves the right to determine whether or not a post violates the “intent†of the “commercial post†policy or definition.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read this I guess it comes down to a at the whim decision whether something is commercial.....I guess it was somebodies opinion of what Club-zoa.com is. The rule states that it don't have to be based on fact of commercial but what the people in "charge" deems commercial whether or not that it is in fact commercial.
Also if you go back through this thread there is no mention of what Club-zoa really is. Only Coral-nuts telling some one to PM somebody.....So see as how nobody posted anything about it either one of two things happened.
1. Somebody felt slighted and complained about it.
2. Somebody googled the name and found what it was....which to me if you have to go looking for something then it isn't necessarily in violation. I'm sure there are many post and posters that if you dig deep enough there might be a hint of violation. The question then remains what is the line that one crosses. The rule with in the agreement is truly arbitrary to those that deem to use it whether it is in fact appropriate or not. I have changed my avatar as requested, but that does not mean that I agree with the decision in part or in whole. I like the fact that also at somebodies choice a group of people all across the country came together in their fanatism about zoanthids found away to identify with each other and the hammer comes down.....I truly expect that all avatars that have Club references to be removed as ours have. If not then the user agreement will then be in violation also as the agreement cuts both ways. It is not just an agreement for us whom use the site but, also those the deem themselves in charge to also abide by that said agreement. One club cannot be in violation while others are not with whom also do the same thing.
Now that I have said my piece... I will let it rest and be what it be...
James
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recognizing that it is impossible to construct a definition which will satisfy every situation or circumstance, Reef Central reserves the right to determine whether or not a post violates the “intent†of the “commercial post†policy or definition.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read this I guess it comes down to a at the whim decision whether something is commercial.....I guess it was somebodies opinion of what Club-zoa.com is. The rule states that it don't have to be based on fact of commercial but what the people in "charge" deems commercial whether or not that it is in fact commercial.
Also if you go back through this thread there is no mention of what Club-zoa really is. Only Coral-nuts telling some one to PM somebody.....So see as how nobody posted anything about it either one of two things happened.
1. Somebody felt slighted and complained about it.
2. Somebody googled the name and found what it was....which to me if you have to go looking for something then it isn't necessarily in violation. I'm sure there are many post and posters that if you dig deep enough there might be a hint of violation. The question then remains what is the line that one crosses. The rule with in the agreement is truly arbitrary to those that deem to use it whether it is in fact appropriate or not. I have changed my avatar as requested, but that does not mean that I agree with the decision in part or in whole. I like the fact that also at somebodies choice a group of people all across the country came together in their fanatism about zoanthids found away to identify with each other and the hammer comes down.....I truly expect that all avatars that have Club references to be removed as ours have. If not then the user agreement will then be in violation also as the agreement cuts both ways. It is not just an agreement for us whom use the site but, also those the deem themselves in charge to also abide by that said agreement. One club cannot be in violation while others are not with whom also do the same thing.
Now that I have said my piece... I will let it rest and be what it be...
James