It's a like a bad movie. You can't help but watch.This has to be the least interesting R2R drama in history... Is it too early to nominate a thread of the year for 2022?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a like a bad movie. You can't help but watch.This has to be the least interesting R2R drama in history... Is it too early to nominate a thread of the year for 2022?
Terms and Conditions pages are Terms and Conditions pages. It applies to all forms, not just "free software downloads" Laws are broad to cover multiple scopes... deal with itKey points related to hitting a download button for free software, yes.
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs
Citation22 Ill.306 F.3d 17, 11 ILRD 832, 2002 ILRC 2017 (2d Cir. 2002) Brief Fact Summary. This case arises from consolidated class-action matters. The Plaintiffs, Specht and others (Plaintiffs), brought suit against the Defendant, Netscape (Defendant). Plaintiffs alleged that because they...www.casebriefs.com
Like how many times I’ve watched Napoleon dynamite ha haIt's a like a bad movie. You can't help but watch.
I just keep trying to rickroll people but I think @JNalley is the only one who clicked it.It's a like a bad movie. You can't help but watch.
clicked what? I haven't clicked any links from this thread...I just keep trying to rickroll people but I think @JNalley is the only one who clicked it.
WWI lost millions of lives because personal grudges of government leaders. TRUTH. Nothing more dangerous than government idiocy.You know if you respond to something with your stupid opinion just ONE MORE TIME then your opponent/enemy/friend responds....it makes it true.....Our military and leaders do it all the time. Ive had to live or die by those stupid decisions. its how rthe world works
Not even one?! Man...clicked what? I haven't clicked any links from this thread...
Plenty of info out there to tell you otherwise that the law did not force companies to honor pricing mistakes. I guess we will see if BRS accepts the order, or issues a full refund.Terms and Conditions pages are Terms and Conditions pages. It applies to all forms, not just "free software downloads" Laws are broad to cover multiple scopes... deal with it
I am now over my jealousy
I’m already done crying I’m eating ice cream now
The question wasn't whether law did or did not force companies to honor pricing mistakes. It was whether or not the terms and conditions page was enforceable as it stands. It is not based on case law about Terms and Conditions pages. Whether or not law has ever forced companies to honor pricing mistakes is another matter entirely.Plenty of info out there to tell you otherwise that the law did not force companies to honor pricing mistakes. I guess we will see if BRS accepts the order, or issues a full refund.
The Legalities of Misprinted Advertising
Federal law does not penalize company owners over honest mistakes made in advertising, including misprints, though the Federal Trade Commission does monitor complaints to ensure that incidents involving one business are indeed inadvertent and not repeated regularly. How a company responds to a...smallbusiness.chron.com
LOL, there is no law that requires a business to honor a honest mistake in pricing, so terms and conditions discussions are irrelevant since they are not required to clarify a pricing irregularity for a law that does not exist. Does BRS HAVE to honor, no. Do they honor this price, it is up to them.The question wasn't whether law did or did not force companies to honor pricing mistakes. It was whether or not the terms and conditions page was enforceable as it stands. It is not based on case law about Terms and Conditions pages. Whether or not law has ever forced companies to honor pricing mistakes is another matter entirely.
I agree with this after looking over case law...regarding terms and conditions. I will still debate if it is an enforceable contract.(Specht v. Netscape Communications. Corp. (2002).
The key points are this:
-The issue here is whether Plaintiffs will be held to an arbitration clause and contractual terms that were inconspicuous due to their online placement.
-...the court held that a reasonably prudent consumer would not assent to contractual terms that are so inconspicuous that they could completely overlook them.
-If a reasonable consumer is not alerted to contractual terms, he cannot assent to same.
-Notice needs to be prominent and stand out so the average website user can’t miss it. Your visitors shouldn’t have to “stumble upon” a link to any of your website agreements.
Those are the findings from the case. It does NOT need be specific to "pricing mistakes" to be applicable to an overlooked Terms and Conditions link placed at the bottom of a website with a dozen or more other links. That alone makes it inconspicuous and not actionable.
I am not sure if you saw in the news..but a judge ordered some football player to pay a 30k reward for finding a dog that he said he would make but didnt want to. Oral contract..so i would say it is possible that it would be enforcable if the parties agreed.Experiment time....
@Mywifeisgunnakillme - The 'GHL ON Sale" in house council - (I value your opinion becuase it it hooked to a degree and not a monday morning armchair)
Everybody stick with me....
If i hypothetically "Ordered" some GHL Items........AND I said i would give some of the items to the Bum Hurt Jealous Bible Thumpers who didn’t order one….. To Which at that point, they conveniently misplace there morals and accept so that their fish could live a better life…….. BUT THEN I dont give them anything but a bad time for being a hypocrite....Would that be considered false advertising? What if I sent them a copy of BRS’s terms and conditions and had them accept?
Dont get ticked at me……Asking for a friend
Oral contracts are just as enforceable as written contracts. However, they are harder to prove and may be subject to statute of frauds.I am not sure if you saw in the news..but a judge ordered some football player to pay a 30k reward for finding a dog that he said he would make but didnt want to. Oral contract..so i would say it is possible that it would be enforcable if the parties agreed.
Now your just being pedantic!Oral contracts are just as enforceable as written contracts. However, they are harder to prove and may be subject to statute of frauds.
Never once said there was, my initial reply to you:LOL, there is no law that requires a business to honor a honest mistake in pricing